perplexity-control-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to perplexity-control-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server that provides intelligent access to Perplexity AI's search and reasoning models with automatic model selection, conversation management, and project-aware storage. Supports real-time search, deep research, chat sessions, and async operations for complex queries.15 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceOfficial MCP server for the Perplexity API Platform, enabling AI assistants to perform real-time web search, reasoning, and deep research using Sonar models.430,284 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceOfficial MCP server for Perplexity API Platform, enabling AI assistants with real-time web search, reasoning, and research capabilities through Sonar models and the Search API.430,284 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceMCP server providing 22 tools to query Perplexity AI's premium models (GPT-5.4, Claude 4.7 Opus, etc.) with citations, source discovery, and rate limit checking for AI agents.2317MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceUnofficial MCP server that wraps the Perplexity AI web API via browser cookies, enabling search, research, reasoning, and ask tools through STDIO.4-
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Several tools have overlapping functionality: sonar_chat, agent_create, and web_search all involve web-searching capabilities, which could confuse an agent. However, the descriptions clearly delineate their use cases, and the async sonar tools are distinct. Overall, some ambiguity remains but descriptions mitigate it.
Tool names are inconsistent in their verb/noun ordering. Some use verb_noun (list_models, estimate_cost), while others use noun_verb (api_key_generate, web_search, sonar_chat). There are consistent sub-patterns like sonar_async_* and api_key_*, but no unified convention across the set.
14 tools is well within the ideal range for a server covering Perplexity's API surface. Each tool addresses a distinct feature area such as API key management, embeddings, search, async jobs, and cost estimation, without feeling bloated or sparse.
The tool set covers core workflows for search, chat, embeddings, and API key management, but notable gaps exist. There is no way to cancel an async Sonar job, list existing API keys, or list/delete agents. These missing lifecycle operations could cause agent failures in certain management scenarios.