Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to jp-lit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables querying Japan's national academic database, CiNii Research, for articles, books, dissertations, KAKEN projects, and researcher profiles via seven MCP tools.
      11
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for searching the National Diet Library of Japan (NDL Search), enabling Japanese-script bibliographic and article searches with rate limiting and attribution.
      6
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for academic literature research that integrates Scopus, CrossRef, OpenAlex, and Unpaywall to search documents, get abstracts, author profiles, citing papers, and open-access PDF links.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server for academic literature retrieval, aggregating multiple data sources like arXiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar to provide search, details, citations, trends, and recommendations.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for searching Japanese Diet bills and committee Q\&A records via the NDL Kokkai API.
      4
      55 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for academic research that enables paper search across 14 sources, PDF download with multi-provider fallback, metadata extraction, and bibliography generation.
      2
      GPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 30 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Descriptions are unusually diligent about cross-referencing sibling tools (e.g. jp_lit_search_fulltext vs jp_lit_search_pages vs jp_lit_get_fulltext, list_cache vs search_cache_index vs refine_results, find_sessions vs list_sessions), which resolves most overlap. However, with roughly a dozen search_* variants and an OCR quartet spanning similar operations, an agent can still misselect among them without reading the long descriptions carefully.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses the jp_lit_ prefix followed by a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (search_*, get_*, list_*, export_*, delete_*, prune_*, find_*, resolve_*, refine_*, annotate_*, update_*, start_*). The verb choice reflects the operation type predictably, so names are readable and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    30 tools is heavy and near the threshold where surface area itself becomes a cognitive burden. The breadth of the domain (many external sources, OCR, authority, session and cache lifecycle) justifies most tools, but some could plausibly be consolidated (e.g. the export pair, the cache listing trio).

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers search across many Japanese bibliography sources, record retrieval (single and batch), fulltext/OCR/page/illustration access, authority resolution, classification vocabulary, enrichment, session lifecycle, cache lifecycle, refining, and export. Minor gaps exist—no session deletion or archiving, and no explicit citation-format (BibTeX/RIS) export—but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues