jp-lit-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to jp-lit-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables querying Japan's national academic database, CiNii Research, for articles, books, dissertations, KAKEN projects, and researcher profiles via seven MCP tools.113MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for searching the National Diet Library of Japan (NDL Search), enabling Japanese-script bibliographic and article searches with rate limiting and attribution.61MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for academic literature research that integrates Scopus, CrossRef, OpenAlex, and Unpaywall to search documents, get abstracts, author profiles, citing papers, and open-access PDF links.9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA MCP server for academic literature retrieval, aggregating multiple data sources like arXiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar to provide search, details, citations, trends, and recommendations.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for searching Japanese Diet bills and committee Q\&A records via the NDL Kokkai API.455 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for academic research that enables paper search across 14 sources, PDF download with multi-provider fallback, metadata extraction, and bibliography generation.2GPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 30 tools
Descriptions are unusually diligent about cross-referencing sibling tools (e.g. jp_lit_search_fulltext vs jp_lit_search_pages vs jp_lit_get_fulltext, list_cache vs search_cache_index vs refine_results, find_sessions vs list_sessions), which resolves most overlap. However, with roughly a dozen search_* variants and an OCR quartet spanning similar operations, an agent can still misselect among them without reading the long descriptions carefully.
Every tool uses the jp_lit_ prefix followed by a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (search_*, get_*, list_*, export_*, delete_*, prune_*, find_*, resolve_*, refine_*, annotate_*, update_*, start_*). The verb choice reflects the operation type predictably, so names are readable and predictable.
30 tools is heavy and near the threshold where surface area itself becomes a cognitive burden. The breadth of the domain (many external sources, OCR, authority, session and cache lifecycle) justifies most tools, but some could plausibly be consolidated (e.g. the export pair, the cache listing trio).
The surface covers search across many Japanese bibliography sources, record retrieval (single and batch), fulltext/OCR/page/illustration access, authority resolution, classification vocabulary, enrichment, session lifecycle, cache lifecycle, refining, and export. Minor gaps exist—no session deletion or archiving, and no explicit citation-format (BibTeX/RIS) export—but agents can work around these.