jp-lit-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to jp-lit-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables querying Japan's national academic database, CiNii Research, for articles, books, dissertations, KAKEN projects, and researcher profiles via seven MCP tools.72MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for searching the National Diet Library of Japan (NDL Search), enabling Japanese-script bibliographic and article searches with rate limiting and attribution.61MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for academic literature research that integrates Scopus, CrossRef, OpenAlex, and Unpaywall to search documents, get abstracts, author profiles, citing papers, and open-access PDF links.9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA MCP server for academic literature retrieval, aggregating multiple data sources like arXiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar to provide search, details, citations, trends, and recommendations.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for searching Japanese Diet bills and committee Q\&A records via the NDL Kokkai API.45 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for academic research that enables paper search across 14 sources, PDF download with multi-provider fallback, metadata extraction, and bibliography generation.2GPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 30 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action (search, get, refine, annotate, export, session lifecycle, cache management), with clear scoping notes to differentiate similar ones (e.g., jp_lit_search vs jp_lit_search_fulltext vs jp_lit_search_pages). Cross-references in descriptions reduce ambiguity.
All tools follow a consistent `jp_lit_` prefix followed by verb_noun (e.g., search, get, list, delete, export, start, update). Conventions are uniform with no mixed styles.
30 tools is on the high side for a single server, but the server covers a broad domain (Japanese literature research across many sources, with search, retrieval, caching, sessions, and enrichment). The count feels heavy but each tool is purposeful, so it's borderline.
The surface covers the full research workflow: multi-source search, full-text search, page-level OCR, record retrieval, enrichment, authority resolution, session tracking, caching, and export. There are no obvious dead ends; every action has a follow-up tool.