Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
isyoon41

PATHWAY Diagnostic MCP

by isyoon41
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to PATHWAY Diagnostic MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • kube-diagnostics-mcp

      ranson21
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only, stack-aware diagnostics for microservices on Kubernetes, turning debugging runbooks into conversational tools that investigate slow requests, changes, leaks, and in-pod conditions without exposing cluster credentials.
      57
      Apache 2.0

    • Computer Expert

      Pawnnwap
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only inspection and diagnosis of Windows, macOS, and Linux machines through eight diagnostic tools covering system profiles, baselines, disk health, startup audits, driver context, and upgrade planning, with voice summaries and a web simulator. It enforces an R0-R3 risk model in code so only safe R0 evidence collection is automatic while riskier actions remain manual guidance.
      MIT

    • PeopleLens

      Levelinteligencia
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language querying of governed, certified People Analytics KPIs over heterogeneous HR data while enforcing data quality, mapping, lineage, and exception rules, including knowing when not to answer.
      -

    • Cloud DevOps MCP Server

      alexcgodwin
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to assess infrastructure-as-code deployment risk, generate incident response runbooks, review CI/CD delivery readiness, and calculate SLO error budgets through structured advisory tools. Runs locally over stdio without cloud credentials or external API calls, returning guidance for platform work, pull request review, and production readiness checks.
      12
      90 npm
      MIT

    • DevTwin MCP

      JaydeepDhamecha
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding agents with structured, evidence-based diagnostics about the local development environment, detecting tech stack, runtime mismatches, dependency state, services, ports, and Git status without exposing secrets or using network calls.
      10
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-dbwatch

      db-mcp-tools
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables on-call database diagnostics: it classifies load pressure, traces root causes with hypothesis-evidence-confidence, detects blocking and lock chains, scores health across a dimension tree, and renders deliverable incident reports. Works from symptom text alone with no database connection or history required (Tier0), escalating to snapshot-based and trend-based analysis as observations accumulate.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools follow a clear diagnostic pipeline (templates -> metrics -> benchmark -> stage -> patterns -> hypotheses -> evidence -> actions -> report), so most purposes are distinct. Minor overlap exists between case-management tools (save_case, get_case) and content-lookup tools (get_catalog, get_input_templates), and build_report vs save_case could be momentarily confused since one produces the JSON the other stores.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (save_case, compute_metrics, assess_stage, recommend_actions, record_review). The lone outlier is next_best_evidence, a noun phrase rather than an action verb, which is a small but noticeable deviation.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well within the ideal range and each maps to a distinct stage of the diagnostic workflow. No tool feels redundant or padded given the multi-phase scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full diagnostic lifecycle from input templates through metrics, benchmarking, hypothesis assessment, action recommendations, reporting, and outcome tracking, with both read and write for cases. Only minor gaps (no explicit case update/delete or bulk case operations) keep it from full marks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources