descargar_resolucion_pdf

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It proactively reveals that the file is saved to a specific location (Downloads folder) and notes the file's official digitally signed nature. However, it doesn't mention overwrite behavior or prerequisites, which is a minor gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, succinct sentence that front-loads the action and includes all essential information without any filler. It is perfectly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with only two parameters and no output schema. The description adequately explains the core behavior (download and save location). It omits details about the return value or error handling, but given the low complexity and strong schema, this is not a significant gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with both parameters (resolucionId and nombreArchivo) having clear descriptions in the input schema. The tool description adds no parameter-specific information, and per the rubric the baseline is 3 when schema coverage is high.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool downloads the official digitally signed PDF of a resolution and saves it to the Downloads folder. This specific verb+resource combination distinguishes it from sibling tools that focus on searching or retrieving content.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when the user needs to obtain the PDF file locally. While it doesn't explicitly name alternatives or exclusions, the sibling tools are all search/retrieve oriented, so the context is clear without needing explicit when-not guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.