Skip to main content
Glama
israelmamani

NLM Expert Research MCP — Frontier

by israelmamani

Related Servers

Alternatives to NLM Expert Research MCP — Frontier

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude (and any MCP-compatible agent) full access to Google NotebookLM — create notebooks, upload sources, ask questions, and generate audio overviews, quizzes, flashcards, mind maps, slide decks, videos, and reports.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An enhanced MCP server that enables users to interact with NotebookLM while ensuring strict source fidelity and citation accuracy through client-side prompt structuring. It guides Claude to transform user queries into structured prompts that prevent the addition of external knowledge during document analysis.
      16
      45
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A robust MCP server for NotebookLM that provides auto-healing authentication, zero-config setup, and tools to list, query, create notebooks, and manage sources.
      6
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for querying Google NotebookLM notebooks, enabling AI assistants to list notebooks, read sources, and ask questions about them.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools have mostly distinct purposes: setup_auth is for login, health for status, doctor for local diagnostics, research for single-notebook queries, compare_notebooks for two-notebook comparisons, and so on. Some potential confusion exists between list_notebooks and notebook_resolve (listing vs resolving one) and doctor vs health, but descriptions clarify the boundaries well.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming follows a mostly verb_noun pattern (list_notebooks, get_evidence, compare_notebooks) but deviates with single-word names (doctor, health, research) and reversed object_verb forms (notebook_resolve, notebook_refresh). This mixed convention is readable but not fully consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools is well-scoped for an expert research MCP, covering authentication, diagnostics, health, notebook discovery, source listing, research, evidence retrieval, and comparison. Each tool earns its place without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full research lifecycle: setup auth, check health, list/resolve/refresh notebooks, list sources, run research, retrieve evidence, and compare notebooks. Minor gaps include lack of a tool to browse all evidence from a session or a single tool to search across multiple notebooks, but these are not core to the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues