asin
Compute the inverse sine (arcsine) of a given value, with result in degrees or radians.
Instructions
Arcsine. Result in degrees by default, or radians with unit param.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| value | Yes | ||
| unit | No |
Compute the inverse sine (arcsine) of a given value, with result in degrees or radians.
Arcsine. Result in degrees by default, or radians with unit param.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| value | Yes | ||
| unit | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate read-only and idempotent nature; description adds default unit behavior, which is useful beyond annotations. No contradictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One concise sentence, front-loaded with function name, no redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple trig function; covers output unit but could mention input domain (e.g., -1 to 1) for completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage; description mentions unit parameter effect but does not clarify the 'value' parameter domain or constraints. Parameter names are self-explanatory but a note on valid input range would improve.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Explicitly names the function 'Arcsine' and specifies output unit behavior, clearly distinguishing it from sibling trig tools like cosine or tangent.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use arcsine versus other inverse trig functions or mathematical operations; lacks context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/islobodan/cruncher-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server