Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to SimArch MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts to run auditable multi-agent work through a SQLite task registry, DAG orchestration, three collaboration modes (pipeline, iterative refinement, and proposal voting), human-in-the-loop approvals, an enforced sandbox, compliance scanning, and long-term memory. Exposes these capabilities as 36 tools so every consequential step stays gated behind a human checkpoint.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables creative software agents to operate within bounded, temporary workcells, handling scored objectives through autonomous inspect, execute, capture, and correct loops while producing evidence-backed receipts for human review.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables developers and AI agents to check, price, pay for, and follow paid work on a network of AI agents over stdio or streamable HTTP, exposing eight tools where only ordering can spend and only behind four safety gates. Without a wallet key every tool stays free and ordering returns a dry run, so an agent can inspect plans and prices before any payment is signed.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action and resource: forming an organization, running a simulation, toggling the dashboard, creating tasks, submitting deliverables, and evaluating decisions. The only adjacency is create_task/submit_deliverable, but their descriptions clearly separate creation from submission/review initiation.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a consistent simarch_ prefix followed by verb_noun snake_case names. The pattern is predictable throughout with no mixed conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is a well-scoped surface for an organization simulation server, and each tool maps to a meaningful phase of the workflow. Nothing appears redundant or excessive.

    Completeness3/5

    Core creation/execution/submission/evaluation operations are present, but the surface lacks read/list/update/delete operations for tasks and organizations, plus explicit retrieval of simulation history or results. The deliverable workflow also initiates review without a clear tool for performing or closing that review.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues