etmoney-lyr
Related Servers
Alternatives to etmoney-lyr
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceExposes Screener.in data for Indian stocks (NSE/BSE) — fundamentals, financial statements, peers, and price/EPS time-series — as tools any MCP client can call.4164 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAI equity-research analyst for Indian NSE/BSE markets with 28 MCP tools enabling sector screens, valuations, SWOTs, and forensic audits using Claude Agent SDK.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides live financial data for any LLM agent, including stock quotes, crypto prices, SEC filings, XBRL financials, FX rates, and macro indicators, through ten MCP tools.1157 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides 10 financial data tools (market data, economic indicators, news, insider trades, and calendars) via a single MCP layer, enabling any MCP-compatible LLM to access diverse financial data through a unified interface.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes portfolio allocation, concentration risk, retirement projections, RAG document search, and a full multi-agent financial advisor query as MCP tools for use from Claude Code.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides MCP tools that let AI agents retrieve stock price data, validate data quality, analyze chart trends and volatility, and fetch news sentiment, enabling structured financial analysis workflows.-
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and operation. Mutual fund tools (mf_*) are separated by action (search, detail, list, compare, featured, categories) and stock tools (stock_screen, index_stocks, sector_stocks, stock_detail) cover distinct data views. No two tools appear to do the same thing.
Mutual fund tools share a consistent 'mf_' prefix pattern. Stock tools are slightly inconsistent: 'stock_screen' and 'stock_detail' use 'stock_', while 'index_stocks' and 'sector_stocks' embed the resource type before 'stocks'. This is a minor deviation from a uniform pattern but still predictable and readable.
With 10 tools, the server is well-scoped for covering two asset classes (mutual funds and stocks). Each tool serves a clear purpose, and the count is within the optimal 3-15 range, neither bloated nor insufficient.
Mutual fund coverage is strong (search, detail, list, compare, featured, categories), but stock coverage has a notable gap: no tool for searching stocks by name, requiring users to already know stock IDs or slugs. This limits discovery and may cause agent failures when trying to locate a specific stock.