CodeGuard MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to CodeGuard MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceSecurely feeds summarized expert security rules into your coding assistance Claude Code, Cursor, etc — zero config, no API key.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI coding agents with deterministic security requirements, approved patterns, and anti-patterns based on a project's threat model defined in security-context.yaml, enabling secure code generation without relying on LLMs for security advice.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI coding agents with real-time access to compliance rules, scan results, and remediation guidance to enforce coding standards and security policies on generated code.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides real-time OWASP ASVS security guidance and vulnerability scanning for AI coding agents. Enables proactive security during code generation by checking security requirements, scanning code for vulnerabilities, and suggesting secure code fixes.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI agents with queryable, version-controlled project rules and coding standards. Enables validation, rule-based guidance, and task summaries to keep AI work aligned with your project's conventions without repeating context.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceCentralizes AI behavior rules and applies them across tools like Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor, enabling agents to fetch up-to-date rules before responding.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have distinct purposes: one retrieves security instructions based on context, the other validates code against rules. However, both involve security instructions, which could cause minor confusion without careful reading.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, 'get_security_instructions' and 'validate_code_security', making them predictable and clear.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a security-focused service. While the core operations are present, the scope appears limited, and additional tools for rule management would be expected.
The server lacks tools for managing or listing security rules, and the validation tool does not provide detailed violation reports. This leaves notable gaps in a typical security workflow.