Skip to main content
Glama
irvingtao123-maker

MailBridge_mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to MailBridge_mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables email management for a single mailbox via IMAP and SMTP protocols. Supports reading, searching, and sending emails with threading support through stdio or HTTP transports.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching, reading full conversations, and sending email across multiple IMAP/SMTP mailboxes from any MCP client, with multi-user support and per-user API tokens.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search, read, send, reply, forward and draft mail, download and extract attachments, and manage labels, stars, archive and trash. It runs over stdio and talks straight to the Gmail API with the user's own OAuth credentials, so no third-party server sits in between.
      53 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only IMAP email access through MCP, including listing accounts and folders, searching messages, retrieving message bodies and attachments, and viewing threads without modifying mail state.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables reading and sending emails via IMAP and SMTP through the MCP protocol. Supports multiple email accounts and configuration via UI or environment variables.
      BSD 3-Clause
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables email integration through MCP, including sending, receiving, searching, replying to, and forwarding emails, plus folder management and multi-account support with encrypted credential storage.
      40
      929 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: list accounts, list messages, read one message, download one attachment, or persist a full message. get_message and export_message are related but clearly separated by in-memory reading vs disk export.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use the consistent mail_<verb>_<noun> snake_case pattern with clear verbs: list, get, download, export. The convention is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools form a compact, focused set for an email bridging/export server. Each tool addresses a necessary step in the retrieval workflow without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The read/export lifecycle is well covered: accounts, message listing, body retrieval, attachment download, and full export. Send, search, folder navigation, and authentication refresh are absent, but those appear out of scope for this bridge; their absence is a minor gap if broader email management is expected.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues