archive_thread
Archive a thread with optional locking to close it for further replies.
Instructions
Archive a thread, optionally locking it
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| thread_id | Yes | ||
| locked | No | Also lock the thread (default false) |
Archive a thread with optional locking to close it for further replies.
Archive a thread, optionally locking it
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| thread_id | Yes | ||
| locked | No | Also lock the thread (default false) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations; description doesn't disclose effects of archiving (e.g., visibility, permissions, reversibility) or locking behavior beyond 'optionally locking it'.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise (6 words) and front-loaded with main action. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Inadequate for a tool with no annotations, no output schema, and only 50% param coverage. Missing details on return value, side effects, and prerequisites.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Adds meaning for 'locked' (repeat of schema description) but nothing for 'thread_id'. Schema coverage is 50%, description partially compensates.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states verb 'archive' and resource 'thread', plus optional locking. Distinguishes from siblings like delete_thread and unarchive_thread.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use vs alternatives like delete_thread or when locking is appropriate. Lacks context for decision making.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/iprashantraj/mcp-discord-bridge'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server