leafwiki-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to leafwiki-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA generic MCP server that turns a directory of Markdown wiki pages into a network-reachable knowledge base, queryable and updatable by any MCP-compatible client.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA secure MCP server for interacting with MediaWiki instances, allowing users to search, read, create, and manage wiki content like pages, categories, and files. It supports both public and private wikis with comprehensive authentication for full read and write operations.19AGPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for managing a personal markdown wiki. Provides search, navigation, read, write, delete, and move tools with automatic index.md management.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for MediaWiki instances with multi-wiki support, providing full read/write access via REST and Action APIs across multiple named wikis.2131 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for MediaWiki wikis. Search, read, edit, and manage wiki content from AI assistants. Includes formatting, link checking, revision history, and markdown conversion.4319MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for mind-wiki — access your personal knowledge wiki from any directory or MCP-compatible client.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 29 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but several boundaries are blurred: edit_page can replace tags, properties, and content, duplicating update_page_tags, update_page_properties, and append_to_page; move_page overlaps sort_pages, and add_page overlaps ensure_path. Descriptions help, but the set still presents multiple overlapping update and path-creation options.
All tool names use consistent snake_case with a verb-first pattern (get_, list_, find_, update_, add_, delete_, etc.). Synonym variation (get/find/search/browse/lookup) exists but does not break the predictable naming convention.
At 29 tools, the surface is heavy for a wiki MCP server, and several tools are redundant conveniences (e.g., update_page_tags, update_page_properties, append_to_page) that edit_page already covers. The count exceeds the 25+ threshold for 'too many' in the rubric.
The set covers the core wiki lifecycle well: page CRUD, move, copy, sort, revisions, tags, properties, favorites, search, tree browsing, and link inspection. Minor gaps exist (e.g., dedicated asset management, tag rename/delete, bulk operations), but no major dead ends.