Follow-Through
Related Servers
Alternatives to Follow-Through
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceTracks commitments (promises made in conversations) and provides tools to add, list, mark as fulfilled, and check overdue items.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceFree AI ops manager that runs locally, auditing ClickUp, Slack, and Teams to catch stale tasks, dropped promises, and buried decisions using your own tokens.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to analyze multi-speaker meeting transcripts from Tencent Meeting, Zoom, and Teams, extract explicit commitments, deadlines, and assignees, prioritize them using an Eisenhower urgency-importance matrix, and generate WeChat Work collaborative task cards.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to capture, manage, and retrieve todos with due dates and provenance, while automatically escalating reminders until tasks are completed.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables structured role-to-role handoffs and merge gating for multi-agent collaboration. It persists evidence and computes approval gates without invoking LLMs.-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceRuns 20 slash-command workflows across Google Calendar, Gmail, Linear, Slack, Granola, Google Docs, GitHub, Stripe, Notion, Google Forms, Sheets and Drive to produce morning briefs, meeting prep, action items assigned to owners and weekly updates. Reads proceed without asking, while anything that creates, sends, changes or deletes is shown for approval first.471Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action or resource: extraction, store CRUD, query, nudge, escalation, evidence search, and demo controls are clearly separated. Even the Linear tools are distinct (create, read, update, escalate) with no overlapping purposes.
All tool names follow a consistent verb-first snake_case pattern (e.g., extract_commitments, query_commitments, linear_update_status). The linear_ prefix is used uniformly for Linear-related tools, and the rest follow standard verb_noun naming with no style mixing.
With 14 tools, the set is well-scoped for the commitment lifecycle domain—covering extraction, tracking, nudging, escalation, evidence gathering, and demo resets. Each tool serves a necessary role, and the count sits comfortably within the ideal range.
The tool surface covers the full workflow from commitment extraction to follow-up, escalation, evidence verification, and closure via Linear status updates. Demo utilities are intentionally separated, and there are no obvious dead ends for the stated purpose.