Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to defaudit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables policy-first defensive security operations for MCP, providing repository and web-security analysis with controlled authorization, scoped execution, and auditability.
      9
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with the public Digital Asset Scan API to analyze digital assets, list assets, retrieve methodology, and poll asynchronous analysis jobs over MCP.
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying SAST code quality and security data from SonarQube and Coverity Connect via MCP, including quality gates, issues, projects, streams, and defects.
      23 npm
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to list workspaces, inspect workspace-scoped findings and hosted runs, and prepare or—after explicit user confirmation—start or rerun hosted reviews. It does not access arbitrary local repositories or return raw diffs, full reports, artifacts, screenshots, credentials, or prompt text.
      2 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action and resource: projects vs scans vs findings, with clear separation of listing, starting, reading status/results, and managing false positives. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., list_projects, start_scan, mark_false_positive). The pattern is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools cover the core scanning and false-positive management workflow without unnecessary bloat. The set is well-scoped for a security audit MCP server.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers project listing, scan initiation/status/results, and false-positive toggling. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no stop_scan or project creation), but the primary workflows are complete and no critical dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues