A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceAn MCP server that wraps Aristotle's automated theorem prover for Lean 4, allowing AI assistants to fill in proofs, verify lemmas, and formalize natural language into Lean code.
14
MIT
prova-mcp
by insinuateai
Related Servers
Alternatives to prova-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides an MCP server for building inspectable reasoning graphs, capturing arguments and evidence, and verifying conditional conclusions using Lean.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that gives small LLMs verified symbolic-math & logic tools.62Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for agentic interaction with the Lean theorem prover via LSP, providing tools for understanding, analyzing, and interacting with Lean projects.2121MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables verification of Lean 4 mathematical proofs via MCP tools, allowing AI clients to compile and check theorems with Mathlib.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that improves LLM reasoning through dialectical argumentation and generates verified code via a player-coach loop.4172MIT
TDQS
A4.3/5.0
Scored across 5 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clear and distinct purpose: downloading proofs, fetching certificates, kernel checking, verifying reasoning, and a combined verify-and-check. There is minimal overlap and descriptions clearly differentiate them.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools use consistent snake_case naming with a verb_noun pattern (e.g., download_lean_proof, verify_reasoning). The naming is predictable and follows a clear convention.
Tool Count5/5
With five tools, the server is appropriately scoped for its purpose of reasoning verification and proof checking. Each tool serves a necessary function without being overly numerous or sparse.
Completeness5/5
The tool set covers the core workflow: verifying reasoning, retrieving certificates, downloading proofs, local kernel checking, and a combined operation. There are no obvious gaps for the intended use case.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues