Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: run_scenario for single projections, sensitivity_analysis for one-at-a-time input variation, break_even for solving target values, compare_scenarios for side-by-side comparisons, list_templates for discovering available models, and health_check for server status. No two tools overlap in functionality, so an agent can unambiguously select the right one.

All tool names use lowercase snake_case, which is consistent and predictable. Most follow a verb_noun pattern (run_scenario, compare_scenarios, list_templates), though sensitivity_analysis and health_check are noun-based. This slight deviation from a pure verb-first convention is minor and doesn't hinder readability.

With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for a scenario simulation domain. Each tool covers a distinct aspect (running, comparing, sensitivity, break-even, template discovery, health), and none feel redundant or missing. This is an appropriate size for the intended functionality.

The tool set covers the core simulation lifecycle: discover templates, run a scenario, compare variants, perform sensitivity analysis, and solve for break-even points. A minor gap is the lack of explicit tools for creating or modifying templates, but since run_scenario supports free-form models and list_templates documents the format, users can work around this limitation.