DecisionMatrix MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to DecisionMatrix MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to perform structured decision-making using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), allowing users to define criteria, compare options pairwise, and calculate ranked results with consistency validation.6-- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables structured decision-making using weighted decision matrices, sensitivity analysis, and robust recommendations.2MIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceOne deterministic reasoning stack behind a single MCP endpoint, chaining scenario simulation, decision analysis, and precision computation with 40-digit decimal math.2423 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA decision structure analysis engine that transforms emotional dilemmas into structured frameworks by identifying variables, constraints, and strategy paths. It helps users evaluate risk distributions and cognitive biases without offering subjective advice or definitive answers.26 npm1MIT

Cruxible Coreofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceDeterministic decision engine with DAG-based receipts. Build entity graphs, query with MCP, get auditable proof.17Apache 2.0- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables traceable requirement discovery, technical alignment, and ISO-aligned process checking through deterministic MCP tools and resources, without requiring an embedded LLM.1-
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Most tools are clearly distinct: create_decision is the main ranking tool, score_options is a stripped-down variant for when the score matrix is supplied separately, and sensitivity_analysis and compare_two serve specialized purposes. There is minor overlap between create_decision and score_options since both return rankings, but the descriptions help differentiate them.
All tools use snake_case, and most follow a verb_noun pattern (create_decision, score_options, compare_two, list_methods). sensitivity_analysis and health_check are noun-style rather than verb_noun, but the naming is still predictable and consistent in style.
With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for a decision-analysis domain. Each tool serves a clear analytical or utility purpose, and there are no redundant or unnecessary additions.
The tool set covers the full decision-analysis workflow: creating decisions, scoring options, sensitivity testing, head-to-head comparison, method reference, and health checks. No obvious gaps exist for the stated purpose, as this appears to be a stateless analysis service rather than a persistent data store.