Skip to main content
Glama
inity13

AgentStack MCP

by inity13
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to AgentStack MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ScenarioSim MCP

      inity13
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A deterministic what-if scenario simulation MCP server that projects business metrics over time with exact decimal arithmetic, offering sensitivity analysis and break-even solving.
      6
      25 npm
      MIT

    • precisioncalc-mcp

      inity13
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides deterministic, high-precision business, finance, and operational calculations such as SaaS metrics, currency conversion, business days, and financial formulas, returning structured JSON results.
      11
      30 npm
      MIT

    • asset-finance-modeler

      Richard7340
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables financial modeling for SaaS and other assets via MCP tools, including simulation, scenario comparison, sensitivity analysis, semantic knowledge search, and persistent context memory.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.5/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are cleanly separated by domain prefixes (sim_, decide_, calc_) with distinct actions. However, decide and decide_score have overlapping outputs, and calc_metric overlaps conceptually with specific calc_npv and calc_irr tools, creating potential confusion.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Domain prefixes give structure, but the suffixes mix verbs and nouns inconsistently (sim_run vs sim_sensitivity, calc_metric vs calc_list_metrics). Composite tools use a completely different naming style, breaking the pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 24 tools, the server is on the heavy side, but the three domains each justify several tools. Some redundancy (decide vs decide_score) could reduce the count, making it borderline.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflows for simulation, decision, and calculation are well covered, including composite tools that span domains. Minor gaps exist, such as no way to create or edit scenario templates and no persistence for decisions, but these are not critical.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources