Skip to main content
Glama
INITE MCP
by inite-ai

Related Servers

Alternatives to INITE MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables auditing AI search visibility: checks site readiness for AI crawlers and measures whether ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend your site, including verbatim answers and citation gap analysis.
      90 npm
      4
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI visibility audits by checking AI crawler access, identity files, and page signals locally, with hosted tools for identity scoring, fix plans, competitor comparison, history, and answer-engine analysis.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to check how discoverable a website is to AI search engines and assistants by inspecting signals like crawler access, llms.txt, structured data, and on-page metadata, and returning a 0-100 visibility score.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI-visibility scoring and site auditing capabilities for websites, enabling agents to check how sites appear in AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, run full SEO/security audits, and monitor changes over time.
      15
      257 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Evaluates any website's AI visibility with 15 checks across crawlability, structure, content, and connectivity, and provides actionable fixes.
      4 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    check_identity is effectively a superset that internally reports robots.txt crawler policy (check_ai_access), identity files (check_identity_files), and Organization schema (check_page_signals), so an agent faces four overlapping readings of the same site and must infer granularity versus composite. The analyze_site/get_analysis and visibility_fixes trio is better separated, and descriptions do explain the differences, but the overlap between the local checks and check_identity is real.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All snake_case and readable, but verb conventions are mixed: check_* for four tools, then analyze_site, get_analysis (which does not match its partner's noun), visibility_fixes (noun-only), compare_sites, and inite_connect. Predictable in the check_* family but not across the set.

    Tool Count4/5

    Ten tools is a sensible scope for an AI-visibility auditing service. However, check_ai_access, check_identity_files, and check_page_signals feel like decompositions of check_identity, so the count is slightly inflated by near-redundant granular tools.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong: crawler policy, identity files, page health, full audit, run retrieval, fixes, comparison, and history all exist for the stated domain. The main gap is that get_analysis needs a known run_id with no tool to list prior audits or runs, and there is no cancel/delete for an in-flight audit.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive