No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 20 tools
Several tools have unclear boundaries: compute_lrs_composite vs compute_lrs_composite_v2 and compute_search_velocity vs compute_search_velocity_v2 compute the same metric under different methodologies, while compute_crossed_matrix is explicitly same-input as compute_dealbreakers_v2. The detailed descriptions help, but the agent still needs versioning and nuance to avoid misselection.
Nearly every tool follows the same snake_case verb_noun pattern, either compute_<metric> or derive_/validate_<object>, and version suffixes like _v2 are used consistently. This makes the namespace highly predictable despite the large number of tools.
20 tools is at the heavy end for a single server, and the v1/v2 duplicate pairs inflate the count without adding clear separate domains. Most tools do have a specific computation, so the count is not unreasonable, but it feels borderline.
The set covers the full idea-audit arc: individual signals, composite scores, unit economics validation, and kill criteria. Minor gaps exist, such as no standalone news sub-score and legacy v1 tools creating ambiguous coverage, but agents can still assemble a complete workflow.
