Zabbix MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Zabbix MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenance🔌 Complete MCP server for Zabbix integration - Connect AI assistants to Zabbix monitoring with 40+ tools for hosts, items, triggers, templates, problems, and more. Features read-only mode and comprehensive API coverage.3260GPL 3.0
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceExposes the complete Zabbix API functionality through the Model Context Protocol, mapping API methods to tools for managing hosts, triggers, and monitoring data. It enables seamless integration and control of Zabbix monitoring environments via natural language interfaces.10025 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes the entire Zabbix API as MCP tools so AI assistants and other MCP clients can query hosts, inspect problems, manage templates and dashboards, acknowledge events, and perform other Zabbix operations. It also adds pre-correlated summary views, graph rendering, anomaly detection and forecasting, PDF report generation, and a two-step write approval flow, with multi-server, token-scoped and read-only deployment options.AGPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes Zabbix monitoring capabilities as callable tools for AI agents and MCP-compatible clients.-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query and manage Zabbix monitoring data—hosts, items, triggers, problems, and health checks—and generate daily, weekly, and monthly operations reports.21GPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceZabbix MCP server and CLI in one Go binary. 15 task-shaped tools: current problems, host investigation, why an alert did or did not arrive, metrics, maintenance. Zabbix 6.4+.15Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 84 tools
Most tools target distinct Zabbix object types, but there are several overlapping pairs: problem_get vs problem_active_get, history_get vs item_history_summary_get, host_get vs host_status_get, hostgroup_get vs hostgroup_overview_get, and item_get vs item_threshold_search. The descriptions explicitly steer the agent between raw and composite tools, which helps, but the large surface still creates meaningful selection ambiguity.
The dominant pattern is snake_case noun_verb (host_get, item_get, problem_get), matching Zabbix API conventions, but action-oriented tools use verb_noun (graph_render, anomaly_detect, capacity_forecast, report_generate) and a few names are irregular (apiinfo_version, health_check, user_checkauthentication, sla_getsli, script_getscriptsbyevents). The convention is readable but not uniform.
84 tools is very heavy for an MCP server, even one covering the broad Zabbix API. Many are near-duplicate read-only getters plus composite convenience wrappers, so the set feels over-expanded rather than tightly scoped.
The surface is overwhelmingly read-only: it covers retrieval for many object types but lacks create/update/delete operations for hosts, items, triggers, maintenance, users, and most other resources. It also lacks common operational actions such as acknowledging or closing problems, so an agent cannot complete many lifecycle workflows.