Skip to main content
Glama
Zabbix MCP Server

Zabbix MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Zabbix MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      🔌 Complete MCP server for Zabbix integration - Connect AI assistants to Zabbix monitoring with 40+ tools for hosts, items, triggers, templates, problems, and more. Features read-only mode and comprehensive API coverage.
      3
      260
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes the complete Zabbix API functionality through the Model Context Protocol, mapping API methods to tools for managing hosts, triggers, and monitoring data. It enables seamless integration and control of Zabbix monitoring environments via natural language interfaces.
      100
      25 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes the entire Zabbix API as MCP tools so AI assistants and other MCP clients can query hosts, inspect problems, manage templates and dashboards, acknowledge events, and perform other Zabbix operations. It also adds pre-correlated summary views, graph rendering, anomaly detection and forecasting, PDF report generation, and a two-step write approval flow, with multi-server, token-scoped and read-only deployment options.
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes Zabbix monitoring capabilities as callable tools for AI agents and MCP-compatible clients.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and manage Zabbix monitoring data—hosts, items, triggers, problems, and health checks—and generate daily, weekly, and monthly operations reports.
      21
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Zabbix MCP server and CLI in one Go binary. 15 task-shaped tools: current problems, host investigation, why an alert did or did not arrive, metrics, maintenance. Zabbix 6.4+.
      15
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 84 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct Zabbix object types, but there are several overlapping pairs: problem_get vs problem_active_get, history_get vs item_history_summary_get, host_get vs host_status_get, hostgroup_get vs hostgroup_overview_get, and item_get vs item_threshold_search. The descriptions explicitly steer the agent between raw and composite tools, which helps, but the large surface still creates meaningful selection ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The dominant pattern is snake_case noun_verb (host_get, item_get, problem_get), matching Zabbix API conventions, but action-oriented tools use verb_noun (graph_render, anomaly_detect, capacity_forecast, report_generate) and a few names are irregular (apiinfo_version, health_check, user_checkauthentication, sla_getsli, script_getscriptsbyevents). The convention is readable but not uniform.

    Tool Count2/5

    84 tools is very heavy for an MCP server, even one covering the broad Zabbix API. Many are near-duplicate read-only getters plus composite convenience wrappers, so the set feels over-expanded rather than tightly scoped.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface is overwhelmingly read-only: it covers retrieval for many object types but lacks create/update/delete operations for hosts, items, triggers, maintenance, users, and most other resources. It also lacks common operational actions such as acknowledging or closing problems, so an agent cannot complete many lifecycle workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessOutdated data