F
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceAn MCP server for managing tasks in Cursor IDE, enabling AI agents to create, update, and comment on tasks via MCP tools, with a kanban dashboard and WebSocket events.
1
-
panel-todo-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to panel-todo-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Kaiten kanban boards, enabling task management via AI assistants like Cursor and Claude Code.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Huly project management that enables AI assistants to manage issues, track time, update statuses, and more directly from your IDE.4 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA portable MCP server enabling AI assistants to operate VS Code, including file management, extension control, and workspace automation.6-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for IDEA Base — AI-powered project management. Manage projects, tasks, and time tracking directly from Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible AI tool.21189 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for end-to-end Jira and GitHub integration, enabling AI agents in the IDE to automate workflows from issue tracking to pull request management.MIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 38 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools target distinct resources and actions, but panelTodo_complete and panelTodo_remove both remove todos (differing only in completion status), and listIssues/searchIssues/getBacklog overlap in listing issues with different filters. The descriptions clearly distinguish these cases, so overall it remains unambiguous.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools share the consistent panelTodo_ prefix and use lowerCamelCase verb_noun style. The only deviation is panelTodo_status, which uses a noun instead of a verb. The pattern is otherwise predictable and coherent.
Tool Count2/5
With 38 tools, the count far exceeds the typical threshold of 25 and feels heavy for a server named 'panel-todo'. While the scope covers many entities, several tools overlap (e.g., complete vs remove, list vs search vs backlog) and could be consolidated. The count would be more appropriate if split into separate local and Pro servers.
Completeness4/5
The tool set provides full CRUD coverage for issues, sprints, tags, and comments, along with essential operations for local todos and projects. The only notable gap is the lack of an updateProject tool, but agents can work around this by using switchProject or recreating projects. Overall, the domain is well covered with minor dead ends.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues