Skip to main content
Glama
infolegalge

legal.ge MCP Server

Official
by infolegalge
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to legal.ge MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • LegalMCP

      Mahender22
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      LegalMCP is a comprehensive US legal MCP server that enables AI assistants to search over 4 million US court opinions, manage Clio practice data, and access PACER federal filings through natural language.
      18
      68
      MIT

    • yargi-mcp

      sigortamhukuk
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving Turkish legal decisions and documents from sources such as Yargıtay, Danıştay, and other courts through MCP tools.
      MIT

    • Jus MCP

      mcp-dir
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables access to comprehensive Brazilian legal data through a single MCP connection, including court cases, DJEN publications, jurisprudence, judicial calculations, procurement from PNCP, TCU decisions, compliance checks, and official certificates—all without login.
      13
      MIT

    • Gyeongguk

      kmjy98-sketch
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Korean legal document processing, case analysis, and consultation using MCP, with OCR parsing, fact extraction, claim identification, subsumption grid, legal API verification, and document drafting.
      24
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools have distinct primary purposes: one returns specialist recommendations, the other only classifies legal intent. However, both return matched practice areas, which could cause some confusion if an agent only needs classification and sees the specialist tool as a heavier version.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: 'find_legal_specialists' and 'classify_legal_intent'. The naming is clear, predictive, and uses the same structural style.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels minimal. While the scope is narrow (legal specialist matching and intent classification), two tools are on the border of being too thin for a general-purpose legal assistant.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the two core operations described in its purpose: classifying legal intent and finding specialists. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to fetch detailed specialist profiles, but the returned URLs serve as a workaround for the user to access full information.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources