create_object

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears the full burden. It discloses that reference attributes require UUID with _guid suffix, but does not mention side effects, permissions, validation, or return behavior. The mutation is implied but not elaborated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two concise sentences with no superfluous words. The first states the purpose, the second provides a key usage tip. It is appropriately front-loaded and every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema and the presence of many sibling tools, the description lacks completeness. It does not specify what the tool returns (e.g., created object ID), prerequisites (e.g., existence of object type), or error conditions. The parameter descriptions in the schema help but do not compensate for these gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all three parameters. The description adds value by instructing how to handle reference attributes (UUID with _guid suffix). This supplements the schema but does not significantly expand beyond it, earning a baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a new directory element or document, with a specific verb 'Создать' and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like update_object or delete_object by implying creation. The additional hint about reference attributes adds specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for creation but does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., update_object, get_object_by_ref). No when-not or context is provided, relying on implied usage from the verb.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.