Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Loki MCP Server

  • A
    license
    D
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    An MCP interface that allows AI assistants to query and analyze Grafana Loki logs using LogQL, with support for authentication and various output formats.
    3
    108 npm
    6
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server for Grafana Loki that enables LLMs to query, tail, and analyze logs, featuring fuzzy container-name matching, compact output, and tools for log patterns, volume, and label discovery. It can run as a local stdio server or a containerized HTTP service.
    9
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    An MCP server that enables AI assistants to query and analyze logs from Grafana Loki using LogQL, supporting label discovery and keyword search.
    4
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    This MCP server enables natural-language querying of Grafana logs by automatically detecting log sources and service labels. It provides read-only access to log data with intelligent caching for efficient repeat queries.
    38 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A read-only stdio MCP server that provides a generic log-querying layer for Grafana/Loki, enabling discovery, retrieval, and aggregation of logs (raw, slow, errors, volumes) through 15 tools, with hard limits on data volume and no built-in business logic.
    15
    8 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server that enables querying logs and metrics from Graylog, Prometheus, and InfluxDB 2.x. It provides tools for executing Lucene log searches, PromQL queries, and Flux queries directly within MCP-compatible clients.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server that enables AI assistants to query Grafana/Loki logs and Thanos/Prometheus metrics directly from MCP-compatible clients like Cursor or Claude Desktop.
    8
    MIT

TDQS

A4.9/5.0

Scored across 5 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool serves a distinct purpose: labels lists names, label_values lists values for a given label, query runs instant queries, query_range runs range queries, and series lists matching streams. No overlap or ambiguity between them.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names are in snake_case and follow a clear pattern: label_values, labels, query, query_range, series. They are consistent in style and predictable, with multi-word names clearly separated by underscores.

Tool Count5/5

With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for a log querying service. Each tool is essential and there are no redundant or excessive entries.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the full read-only workflow for Loki: discovering labels, discovering label values, running instant queries, running range queries, and checking stream coverage. No obvious gaps for typical use cases.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive