Skip to main content
Glama
inceon

Bitbucket MCP Server

by inceon

Bitbucket MCP Server

License: MIT CI Node.js MCP

A production-focused Model Context Protocol server for retrieving pull request metadata and diffs from Bitbucket Cloud and Bitbucket Server/Data Center, with opt-in pull request comments.

Features

  • Supports Bitbucket Cloud and self-hosted Bitbucket Server/Data Center.

  • Exposes focused tools for pull request metadata, diffs, review discussion, and general or inline comments.

  • Supports bearer tokens and basic authentication.

  • Returns raw diffs plus structured changed-file data when Bitbucket provides it.

  • Excludes generated files, folders, or file types through configurable glob patterns.

  • Caps large diffs without breaking UTF-8 characters.

  • Uses stdio without writing protocol-breaking logs to stdout.

  • Keeps comment creation disabled by default and does not approve, merge, or otherwise modify pull requests.

Related MCP server: Atlassian Bitbucket MCP Server

Quick start

Requires a supported Node.js LTS release (Node.js 22 or newer).

git clone https://github.com/inceon/bitbucket-mcp.git
cd bitbucket-mcp
npm install
npm run build
cp .env.example .env

Set BITBUCKET_URL and BITBUCKET_TOKEN in your MCP client configuration, then launch the compiled server with node dist/index.js. The server intentionally does not load .env files itself; MCP clients should pass environment variables directly.

Authentication

Bearer authentication is the default and is recommended for Bitbucket Server/Data Center personal access tokens:

BITBUCKET_URL=https://bitbucket.example.com/bitbucket
BITBUCKET_TOKEN=your-personal-access-token
BITBUCKET_AUTH_TYPE=bearer

For Bitbucket Cloud API tokens or app passwords that require basic authentication:

BITBUCKET_URL=https://api.bitbucket.org
BITBUCKET_TOKEN=your-api-token-or-app-password
BITBUCKET_AUTH_TYPE=basic
BITBUCKET_USERNAME=your-bitbucket-username

Grant the credential only the permissions needed for the tools you enable. Comment creation requires permission to create pull request comments. Never commit credentials or put real tokens in issue reports.

Environment variables

Variable

Required

Default

Description

BITBUCKET_URL

Yes

-

Bitbucket base URL, such as https://api.bitbucket.org or https://bitbucket.example.com/bitbucket

BITBUCKET_TOKEN

Yes

-

API token, app password, or personal access token

BITBUCKET_AUTH_TYPE

No

bearer

bearer or basic

BITBUCKET_USERNAME

For basic auth

-

Username paired with the token for basic auth

BITBUCKET_MAX_DIFF_BYTES

No

200000

Maximum UTF-8 byte size returned in rawDiff; increase explicitly for unusually large-context clients

BITBUCKET_MAX_DIFF_INPUT_BYTES

No

10000000

Maximum bytes read from an upstream raw diff before stopping

BITBUCKET_MAX_JSON_BYTES

No

10000000

Maximum bytes read from any Bitbucket JSON response

BITBUCKET_MAX_COMMENT_COUNT

No

5000

Maximum pull request comments collected across pages

BITBUCKET_MAX_COMMENT_PAGES

No

100

Maximum pull request comment pages followed

BITBUCKET_MAX_COMMIT_COUNT

No

5000

Maximum pull request commits collected across pages

BITBUCKET_MAX_COMMIT_PAGES

No

100

Maximum pull request commit pages followed

BITBUCKET_MAX_DIFF_FILES

No

5000

Maximum structured changed-file entries collected across pages

BITBUCKET_MAX_DIFF_PAGES

No

100

Maximum structured changed-file pages followed

BITBUCKET_REQUEST_TIMEOUT_MS

No

30000

Deadline in milliseconds for each Bitbucket HTTP request

BITBUCKET_IGNORE_PATTERNS

No

-

Comma-separated file globs excluded from every PR diff

BITBUCKET_ENABLE_WRITE_TOOLS

No

false

Set to true to allow tools that modify Bitbucket: PR creation and comments

The server writes startup errors only to stderr and redacts configured credentials from Bitbucket HTTP error snippets.

MCP configuration

Claude Desktop configuration:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bitbucket": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["/absolute/path/to/my-bitbucket-mcp/dist/index.js"],
      "env": {
        "BITBUCKET_URL": "https://api.bitbucket.org",
        "BITBUCKET_TOKEN": "your-token"
      }
    }
  }
}

Codex config.toml configuration:

[mcp_servers.bitbucket]
command = "node"
args = ["/absolute/path/to/my-bitbucket-mcp/dist/index.js"]

[mcp_servers.bitbucket.env]
BITBUCKET_URL = "https://api.bitbucket.org"
BITBUCKET_TOKEN = "your-token"

Available tools

get_pull_request

Returns pull request metadata, including its description, state, author, reviewers, branches, timestamps, and links.

{
  "name": "get_pull_request",
  "arguments": {
    "workspace": "my-workspace",
    "repository": "my-repository",
    "pull_request_id": 123
  }
}

get_pull_request_comments

Returns existing general and inline discussion as provider-native comment objects. Use it before posting a review finding to account for existing feedback. commentsStatus.complete is false with reason max_comments or max_pages when the configured retrieval bounds are reached.

get_pull_request_commits

Returns provider-native commits currently in the pull request. Use it to trace a finding to its originating commit or verify whether later work addresses it. commitsStatus.complete is false with reason max_commits or max_pages when the configured retrieval bounds are reached.

get_pull_request_diff

Returns a git-style review diff and structured changed files when available.

{
  "name": "get_pull_request_diff",
  "arguments": {
    "workspace": "PROJECT_KEY",
    "repository": "my-repository",
    "pull_request_id": 123,
    "ignore_patterns": ["dist/**", "**/*.generated.ts", "package-lock.json"],
    "path": "src/service.ts",
    "context": 5,
    "ignore_whitespace": true,
    "renames": true
  }
}

Diff output is available both as backward-compatible JSON text and as MCP structuredContent, with an advertised output schema. It includes:

  • provider, pull_request_id, rawDiff, rawDiffBytes, and rawDiffSource. rawDiffSource is provider_raw for Cloud or server_structured for a locally normalized Server/Data Center response.

  • truncated plus truncationReason: input_limit when the upstream Cloud read limit was reached, output_limit when the filtered result exceeded BITBUCKET_MAX_DIFF_BYTES, or provider_limit when Server/Data Center marked its structured diff as truncated.

  • Optional compact files entries contain only path, normalized status, and oldPath for renames or copies. Required filesStatus reports completeness; complete is false with reason max_files, max_pages, or unsupported, and returned reflects the filtered entries actually returned.

  • Optional ignored metadata when exclusions are active.

Complete result:

{
  "provider": "cloud",
  "pull_request_id": 123,
  "rawDiff": "diff --git ...",
  "rawDiffBytes": 128,
  "rawDiffSource": "provider_raw",
  "files": [],
  "filesStatus": { "available": true, "complete": true, "returned": 0 },
  "truncated": false
}

Bounded partial result:

{
  "provider": "cloud",
  "pull_request_id": 123,
  "rawDiff": "diff --git ...",
  "rawDiffBytes": 200000,
  "rawDiffSource": "provider_raw",
  "files": [{ "path": "src/service.ts", "status": "modified" }],
  "filesStatus": {
    "available": true,
    "complete": false,
    "returned": 1,
    "reason": "max_pages"
  },
  "truncated": true,
  "truncationReason": "output_limit"
}

Truncated rawDiff is a UTF-8-safe review prefix, not necessarily a complete line, hunk, or applicable patch.

Structured file pages are followed until complete or until a configured files/pages bound is reached, then normalized to compact review metadata rather than returning provider hashes, links, and duplicate path structures. An unavailable diffstat or changes endpoint is reported only after HTTP 404. Authorization, rate-limit, server, malformed-response, timeout, and transport failures fail the tool call rather than silently omitting metadata.

Cloud rawDiff preserves the provider's raw response. Server/Data Center uses the structured /diff response and normalizes its files, hunks, segments, and lines into git-style review text; this avoids version-specific failures from the separate .diff export route. rawDiffSource makes that distinction explicit.

path is supported for both providers and is the preferred way to review large pull requests file-by-file; returned files metadata is scoped to the same path. renames is Cloud-only. context maps to Cloud context and Server/Data Center contextLines. ignore_whitespace maps to Cloud ignore_whitespace and Server/Data Center whitespace=ignore-all. When absent, these controls do not alter provider defaults.

Patterns use repository-relative paths and support *, **, and ?. A pattern without /, such as package-lock.json or *.png, matches that filename anywhere. A trailing slash excludes a directory recursively. When exclusions are active, the response includes ignored.patterns, ignored.files, and ignored.rawDiffFiltered. A false rawDiffFiltered value means a Cloud provider returned a non-git diff format that could not be filtered safely; the response is preserved instead of silently dropping content.

add_pull_request_comment

Creates a general, file-level, or inline line comment on a pull request. This write operation is available only when BITBUCKET_ENABLE_WRITE_TOOLS=true is set in the MCP server environment.

General comment:

{
  "name": "add_pull_request_comment",
  "arguments": {
    "workspace": "my-workspace",
    "repository": "my-repository",
    "pull_request_id": 123,
    "comment": "The implementation looks good. Please add a regression test for the empty input case."
  }
}

Inline comment on an added line:

{
  "name": "add_pull_request_comment",
  "arguments": {
    "workspace": "my-workspace",
    "repository": "my-repository",
    "pull_request_id": 123,
    "comment": "Please handle an empty value here.",
    "file_path": "src/service.ts",
    "line": 42,
    "line_type": "added"
  }
}

Use line_type values added, removed, or context. Added lines default to the new side, removed lines default to the old side, and context lines default to new; set line_side explicitly to place a context comment on old. Provide file_path without line fields for a file-level comment. For renamed files on Server/Data Center, source_file_path can identify the previous path.

The authenticated Bitbucket user becomes the comment author. Review the target workspace, repository, pull request ID, and comment text before approving the tool call in your MCP client.

create_pull_request

Creates a pull request from a pushed source_branch into destination_branch. This write operation requires BITBUCKET_ENABLE_WRITE_TOOLS=true. Supply a title and verify the workspace, repository, and target branch before approval; the authenticated Bitbucket user becomes the author.

Provider behavior

The URL host determines the provider. bitbucket.org and api.bitbucket.org use Bitbucket Cloud; all other hosts use Server/Data Center.

Cloud URLs are normalized to one /2.0 API prefix and use:

  • /repositories/{workspace}/{repository}/pullrequests/{id}

  • /repositories/{workspace}/{repository}/pullrequests/{id}/diff

  • /repositories/{workspace}/{repository}/pullrequests/{id}/diffstat

  • /repositories/{workspace}/{repository}/pullrequests/{id}/comments (GET; POST when enabled)

  • /repositories/{workspace}/{repository}/pullrequests (POST when enabled)

  • /repositories/{workspace}/{repository}/pullrequests/{id}/commits (GET)

Server/Data Center URLs preserve a context path such as /bitbucket, normalize to one /rest/api/1.0 prefix, and use:

  • /projects/{project}/repos/{repository}/pull-requests/{id}

  • /projects/{project}/repos/{repository}/pull-requests/{id}/diff (structured diff normalized to git-style review text)

  • /projects/{project}/repos/{repository}/pull-requests/{id}/diff/{path} (path-scoped structured diff)

  • /projects/{project}/repos/{repository}/pull-requests/{id}/changes

  • /projects/{project}/repos/{repository}/pull-requests/{id}/comments (GET; POST when enabled)

  • /projects/{project}/repos/{repository}/pull-requests (POST when enabled)

  • /projects/{project}/repos/{repository}/pull-requests/{id}/commits (GET)

The optional diffstat or changes request reports filesStatus.reason: "unsupported" after HTTP 404. Other HTTP, timeout, transport, and parsing failures fail the tool call so incomplete metadata is not mistaken for a complete response.

Atlassian Rovo MCP

Atlassian documents a Cloud-only bitbucketPullRequest.diff action, but does not publish its argument schema, output shape, pagination, filtering, or truncation contract. This server therefore keeps direct Bitbucket APIs authoritative. A Rovo adapter should be added only after validating a live tools/list schema and controlled diff response; it must remain explicitly configured and cannot replace Server/Data Center support. See Atlassian's supported-tools page.

Roadmap

Planned areas for future releases include:

  • Add retry handling and clearer rate-limit diagnostics.

  • Provide normalized pull request output while retaining access to provider-specific fields.

  • Add read-only tools for listing pull requests and retrieving build status.

  • Offer an optional Streamable HTTP transport while keeping stdio as the default.

  • Publish versioned releases with simpler installation and upgrade paths.

Write operations will remain disabled by default. Approving, merging, and other high-impact Bitbucket operations are not planned. Ideas and implementation proposals are welcome through GitHub issues.

Development

npm run dev        # Run directly from TypeScript
npm run build      # Compile to dist/
npm test           # Run the test suite once
npm run test:watch # Run tests in watch mode
npm run check      # Build and test, matching CI

The command registry keeps each MCP tool isolated under src/tools. See CONTRIBUTING.md before opening a pull request.

Security

This server handles credentials in memory and sends them only to the configured BITBUCKET_URL. Review that URL carefully before starting the server. Enabling write tools allows connected MCP clients to create pull requests and publish PR comments as the authenticated Bitbucket user. To report a vulnerability privately, follow SECURITY.md.

License

Released under the MIT License.

Available Tools

3 tools
add_pull_request_commentA

Creates a general, file, or inline line comment on a Bitbucket pull request. This is a write operation and requires BITBUCKET_ENABLE_WRITE_TOOLS=true.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
workspaceYesBitbucket Cloud workspace ID or Bitbucket Server/Data Center project key
repositoryYesRepository slug or repository name
pull_request_idYesPull request ID
commentYesComment text. Bitbucket Cloud renders supported Markdown.
file_pathNoOptional destination-side repository path for a file or line comment.
source_file_pathNoOptional previous path for a renamed or copied file. Used by Server/Data Center.
lineNoOptional 1-based diff line number. Requires file_path and line_type.
line_typeNoKind of diff line. Requires file_path and line.
line_sideNoDiff side. Defaults to old for removed lines and new otherwise.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description declares write operation and environment variable requirement, but omits details on side effects, permissions, rate limits, or comment management (editing/deletion).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: one sentence plus a note on prerequisites. No unnecessary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Missing explanation of return values (no output schema), no guidance on combining file_path, line, line_type, line_side for inline comments. Given 9 parameters and write nature, more context needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%; each parameter is documented in the schema. The description adds no extra semantic value beyond summarizing the tool's purpose.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it creates a comment on a Bitbucket pull request, specifying three types: general, file, or inline line comment. Different from sibling read-only tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly identifies it as a write operation requiring BITBUCKET_ENABLE_WRITE_TOOLS=true. Does not explicitly state when to use versus siblings, but the read-only nature of siblings implies the writing use case.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_pull_requestA

Retrieves metadata, description, state/status, author, reviewers, source branch, destination branch, timestamps, and links for a specific Bitbucket pull request.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
workspaceYesBitbucket Cloud workspace ID or Bitbucket Server/Data Center project key
repositoryYesRepository slug or repository name
pull_request_idYesPull request ID

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It describes what data is retrieved but does not mention any behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or potential performance implications. For a simple read operation, this is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that efficiently lists the retrieved data without any fluff. Every phrase adds value, and the structure is front-loaded with the verb and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description does a good job of listing the expected return fields (metadata, description, state, author, reviewers, branches, timestamps, links). It is fairly comprehensive, though it could be improved by noting if any fields are nested or if there are pagination details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, meaning all parameters are described in the schema. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema; it simply restates that the tool retrieves for a specific pull request. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Retrieves' and clearly lists the resource ('metadata, description, state/status, author, reviewers, source branch, destination branch, timestamps, and links for a specific Bitbucket pull request'). It distinguishes from sibling tools (add_pull_request_comment and get_pull_request_diff) by focusing on retrieval of metadata, not adding comments or getting diffs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives. While the purpose is clear, there is no guidance on when not to use it or which sibling tool to choose for other tasks. The agent must rely on tool names and context, which is adequate but not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_pull_request_diffA

Retrieves the raw diff and, when available, a structured list of changed files for a specific Bitbucket pull request.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
workspaceYesBitbucket Cloud workspace ID or Bitbucket Server/Data Center project key
repositoryYesRepository slug or repository name
pull_request_idYesPull request ID

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description mentions return content (raw diff and structured files) but does not discuss side effects, authentication needs, or limitations such as file size constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that is direct and waste-free, conveying the essential information efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a retrieval tool with three fully described parameters and no output schema, the description adequately states what is returned. Slightly incomplete in not mentioning that diff may be large or truncated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all three parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'retrieves' and resources 'raw diff' and 'structured list of changed files' for a specific Bitbucket pull request, distinguishing it from sibling tools like add_pull_request_comment and get_pull_request.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs siblings; usage is implied by the name and description but not directly stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 3 tool updatesv1.0.0
    • First observedadd_pull_request_comment
    • First observedget_pull_request
    • First observedget_pull_request_diff

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct aspect of pull requests: commenting, metadata retrieval, and diff retrieval. No functional overlap, making selection clear.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (add_*, get_*, get_*), which is predictable and easy to follow.

Tool Count3/5

Three tools is minimal for a Bitbucket server; it covers only basic pull request read operations and commenting, missing core CRUD operations, but it is not extreme.

Completeness2/5

The toolset lacks essential operations like listing, creating, updating, or merging pull requests. Agents cannot perform a full workflow, leaving significant gaps.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/inceon/bitbucket-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server