Skip to main content
Glama
imprvhub

Domain Availability Checker MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to Domain Availability Checker MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to check domain name availability using WHOIS lookups.
      12 npm
      4
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for Internet.bs domain registrar API. Enables checking availability, registering, renewing, and managing domains and DNS from Claude or any MCP client.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Intelligent domain name suggestion service that checks real-time availability across multiple providers and works with MCP-compatible tools like Cursor and Claude Code.
      13
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that exposes the full WhoisFreaks API suite as AI-callable tools. Works with Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, Continue, Zed, and any other MCP-compatible AI client.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server providing automated domain valuation, authoritative WHOIS lookup, and comparable sales analysis for AI agents
      6
      3
      12 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    check_domain checks a single fully-qualified domain while suggest_domains sweeps one second-level name across many TLDs, so their core purposes differ. However, check_domain's fallback of checking a bare name across the popular TLDs partially duplicates suggest_domains' default 'popular' category, which could cause occasional misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a clean verb_noun pattern (check_domain, suggest_domains) with snake_case throughout. The parameter names (domain, name, category) are also consistent and descriptive.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin even for a narrow availability-checking server; there is no single-vs-batch parity beyond TLD sweeps. It is defensible but borderline sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    The check-and-sweep pair covers the core lifecycle of domain availability lookup, including authoritative RDAP/WHOIS/DNS sources and TLD batching. Minor gaps remain: no way to check multiple distinct second-level names in one call and no results for pricing or registrar handoff.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow