Skip to main content
Glama

api_put

Update resources by sending a PUT request to any API endpoint with JSON payload and custom headers.

Instructions

Perform a PUT request to an API endpoint

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYesAPI endpoint URL
dataYesRequest body data (JSON string)
headersNoRequest headers

Implementation Reference

  • The handleApiPut function that executes the api_put tool logic. It uses Playwright's APIRequestContext to perform a PUT request with the given URL, data (JSON string), and optional headers. Returns the response status and body.
    async function handleApiPut(client: APIRequestContext, args: any): Promise<{ toolResult: CallToolResult }> {
      try {
        const options = {
          data: args.data,
          headers: args.headers || { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }
        };
    
        const response = await client.put(args.url, options);
        const responseData = await getResponseData(response);
    
        return {
          toolResult: {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: `PUT ${args.url} - Status: ${response.status()}`,
              },
              ...responseData
            ],
            isError: false,
          },
        };
      } catch (error) {
        return {
          toolResult: {
            content: [{
              type: "text",
              text: `PUT request failed: ${(error as Error).message}`,
            }],
            isError: true,
          },
        };
      }
    }
  • The input schema definition for the api_put tool. Defines required parameters: url (string), data (string for JSON body), and optional headers (object with string values).
    {
      name: "api_put",
      description: "Perform a PUT request to an API endpoint",
      inputSchema: {
        type: "object",
        properties: {
          url: { type: "string", description: "API endpoint URL" },
          data: { type: "string", description: "Request body data (JSON string)" },
          headers: { 
            type: "object", 
            description: "Request headers",
            additionalProperties: { type: "string" }
          }
        },
        required: ["url", "data"]
      }
    },
  • The switch case in executeToolCall that dispatches to handleApiPut when toolName is 'api_put'.
    case "api_put":
      return await handleApiPut(apiClient!, args);
  • src/tools.ts:14-20 (registration)
    api_put is listed as one of the API_TOOLS, which are used to determine if the API client needs to be initialized.
    export const API_TOOLS = [
      "api_get",
      "api_post",
      "api_put",
      "api_patch",
      "api_delete"
    ];
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only states 'PUT request' implying mutation, but omits critical details like idempotency, side effects, authentication needs, or error behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is concise and front-loaded, but does not add meaningful content beyond the tool name; minimal but not wasteful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema and no behavioral details; for a tool with 3 parameters and nested objects, the description is insufficient to fully understand usage and return values.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all 3 parameters with descriptions; description adds no extra meaning beyond what schema already provides, meeting the baseline for high coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action ('Perform a PUT request') and resource ('API endpoint'), but lacks differentiation from sibling tools like api_patch or api_post, which perform similar HTTP methods.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use PUT versus other HTTP methods (e.g., PATCH for partial updates, POST for creation). Does not mention idempotency or replacement semantics.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/imprvhub/mcp-browser-agent'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server