Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to cited-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Checks whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini cite your brand for a given keyword, and who's winning the citation battle for it instead.
      2
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables auditing AI search visibility: checks site readiness for AI crawlers and measures whether ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend your site, including verbatim answers and citation gap analysis.
      147 npm
      4
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables instant scanning of any business to check if AI engines recommend it, providing verbatim evidence.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to scan brand visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Perplexity, analyze website GEO readiness, compare competitors, and get actionable recommendations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to scan any website for AI search visibility, producing AEO, GEO, agent readiness, and mention-readiness scores along with AI identity and business profile insights. Paid tools extend this to competitive comparisons, detailed audits, and generated fixes.
      4
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of overlap or misselection. The tool's purpose is clearly distinct and unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern (check_ai_visibility). With only one tool, consistency is trivially satisfied.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool is on the thin side for the server's stated purpose; while the tool is comprehensive, the absence of auxiliary tools (e.g., engine configuration, result retrieval) makes the surface feel minimal. The rubric considers 1-2 tools borderline.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers the core AI visibility check thoroughly, including question generation, multi-engine querying, and detailed reporting. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no way to select specific engines or retrieve historical data), but these are not critical for the primary use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues