Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to cited-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to ask buyer questions across Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini and receive sampled answer rows, brand named/cited rates, competitor rates, and cited sources. Runs the tracking workflow on Apify and returns dataset rows ready for analysis.
      1
      326 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to query ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini with customer questions and report whether a business is recommended, where it ranks, and which competitors are named instead.
      4
      60 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Checks whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini cite your brand for a given keyword, and who's winning the citation battle for it instead.
      6
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables auditing AI search visibility: checks site readiness for AI crawlers and measures whether ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend your site, including verbatim answers and citation gap analysis.
      90 npm
      4
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables instant scanning of any business to check if AI engines recommend it, providing verbatim evidence.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to scan brand visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & Perplexity, analyze website GEO readiness, compare competitors, and get actionable recommendations.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of overlap or misselection. The tool's purpose is clearly distinct and unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern (check_ai_visibility). With only one tool, consistency is trivially satisfied.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool is on the thin side for the server's stated purpose; while the tool is comprehensive, the absence of auxiliary tools (e.g., engine configuration, result retrieval) makes the surface feel minimal. The rubric considers 1-2 tools borderline.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers the core AI visibility check thoroughly, including question generation, multi-engine querying, and detailed reporting. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no way to select specific engines or retrieve historical data), but these are not critical for the primary use case.