Skip to main content
Glama
impossibleG

impossible-mcp

by impossibleG
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to impossible-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-server-starter-kit

      operatorsheets
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A production-shaped starter for building MCP servers in TypeScript, featuring stdio and streamable HTTP transport, bearer auth, and example tools including ping and http_get_json with SSRF guards.
      2
      MIT

    • MCP Server TypeScript

      ichetanmittal
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A production-ready TypeScript MCP server providing basic tools (add, echo, timestamp), resources (server info, greetings, data access), and prompt templates (analyze, code-review, summarize). Serves as a foundation for building custom MCP servers with extensible architecture.
      339 npm
      -

    • MCP-Server-Starter-Kit

      MosetiReagan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables developers to scaffold production-ready MCP servers with typed tools, resources, prompts, transports, authentication, and database integrations.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one echoes text, the other returns the server time. There is no possibility of an agent confusing them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    'echo' follows a verb style while 'server-time' uses a noun-phrase style with a hyphen, so the naming convention is not fully consistent. However, with only two tools, the mismatch is minor and both names are readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is on the thin side for a server, but the functionality is simple and each tool serves a clear standalone purpose. The count feels minimal rather than excessive.

    Completeness3/5

    The server has no clearly defined domain, so there are no obvious CRUD gaps. As a minimal utility set, echo and server-time cover their stated functions, but the surface is too sparse to call it complete for any broader purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources