Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mobilerun-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control, inspect, and automate Android devices, Waydroid containers, and AVD emulators over ADB. Provides tools for screenshots, UI-hierarchy text-based tapping, gestures, key presses, text input, app management, and raw shell commands.
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate Android and iOS devices, including emulators and physical devices, by capturing screenshots, reading UI accessibility trees, performing touch and text input, and managing app lifecycle and logs.
      18
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an AI client to control an Android emulator or USB device over ADB by selecting a device, inspecting the UI hierarchy, and performing taps, swipes, text entry, key presses, and app launches. It relies only on Android platform-tools and exposes a compatible tool surface for phone automation.
      12
      386 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to visually perceive and directly control Android devices via ADB and screen-control tooling, including screenshots, taps, swipes, typing, app management, UI inspection, file transfer, shell commands, and audio/video streaming.
      374 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to drive a connected Android phone over ADB with 28 tools covering screenshots and UI inspection, taps/swipes/typing, app install and launch, file transfer, wireless pairing, and one-call scripted flows like tap-by-text and wait-for-text.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 94 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools overlap heavily: ui/ui_json/ui_with_recovery/get_ui_tree/perceive_screen/read_screen all return screen state, screenshot/screenshot_path/get_screenshot are near-duplicates, and tap/tap_text/tap_node/tap_and_wait plus press/press_home/press_back/press_enter/key blur action boundaries. The descriptions do hint at distinctions (raw vs annotated, coordinate vs text), but the sheer number of near-synonyms with legacy aliases ('kept for old clients', 'prefer ...') makes misselection likely.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost everything follows a snake_case verb_noun convention (get_screenshot, launch_app, list_devices, press_home). Deviations are minor: bare nouns (ui, capabilities, time, echo), a single-word verb 'press' vs compound 'press_home', and a few legacy synonyms. Overall predictable and readable.

    Tool Count1/5

    94 tools is far beyond what a device-control surface needs, and much of the count comes from redundant aliases and overlapping variants (multiple screenshot tools, multiple screen-read tools, multiple tap/wait/key variants). This is an extreme mismatch that burdens selection.

    Completeness5/5

    Coverage is exhaustive: input gestures, UI perception, app lifecycle (install/uninstall/stop/grant), files, notifications, media, clipboard, device management, deep links, safety validation, and a task-planning/verification loop. Nearly every lifecycle operation for the domain is present with no obvious dead ends.