teamhub-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to teamhub-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to share a persistent, git-backed team memory, automatically committing and syncing decisions, solutions, gotchas, statuses, and handoffs across projects and MCP clients.301MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceProvides a shared context layer for AI agent teams to improve token efficiency through context deduplication and incremental state sharing. It enables multiple agents to coordinate tasks, share real-time discoveries, and manage dependencies while significantly reducing redundant data transmission.1508MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables multiple AI coding agents to coordinate on a shared software project by registering, claiming tasks, declaring file intents, publishing structured change reports, and handing off context, with a local dashboard showing state in near real time.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceGives AI coding agents persistent, branch-aware memory and a dependency-tracked task graph by storing decisions, lessons, and tasks as plain JSON and Markdown committed directly into the repository. Agents can record and fuzzy-search past decisions, dump instant project context, and create, claim, complete, and query tasks whose completion automatically unblocks downstream work.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI coding agents with git-native persistent memory and a dependency-aware task graph, letting them record and fuzzy-recall architectural decisions, lessons, and gotchas while creating, claiming, and completing tasks that auto-unblock downstream work. Stores everything as plain JSON and Markdown committed inside the repository, so context stays branch-aware, team-shared, and reviewable in pull requests.10 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agentic coding tools to maintain a living, in-repo model of intent, architecture, and code, with deterministic indexing, bidirectional linking, and continuous drift detection for task-scoped context and reconciliation.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct resource/action in the task/plan/file-note lifecycle, but get_context, get_plan, and get_handoff_brief have overlapping retrieval purposes. The descriptions mitigate this with explicit guidance (prefer get_handoff_brief for handoffs), so misselection is unlikely but not impossible.
All tools use clear snake_case verb_noun names like get_context, declare_task, update_plan, and check_file_before_edit. Retrieval consistently uses get_, while mutations use declare/claim/update/log/record, forming a predictable pattern.
12 tools is well-scoped for a team-coordination server: task lifecycle, plan management, file annotations, activity logging, and context aggregation are each represented. There is no obvious bloat or thinness.
Core workflows are covered end-to-end: task declaration/claiming/status updates, plan read/write, file rationale notes, freshness checks, and handoff context. Minor gaps exist—such as no way to delete or retract a file note—but agents can work around these without dead ends.