Skip to main content
Glama
imharikumaran

Altimateguide Agent MCP Server

by imharikumaran
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Altimateguide Agent MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • asc-mcp

      anupamchugh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage App Store Connect apps, including registering bundle IDs, uploading metadata and screenshots, setting age ratings, managing TestFlight groups and testers, and submitting apps for review.
      MIT

    • jev-domain-mcp

      jiawei686
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to call typed code-review and content-moderation decision tools, returning structured verdicts, probabilities, and confidence-gated actions.
      2
      MIT
    • stendium-mcp by stendium

      stendium-mcpofficial

      stendium
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP-compatible agent to publish tool cards to Stendium, a portfolio showcase, after user confirmation.
      6 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: the two login steps are explicitly sequenced, whoami verifies the token, list_categories and check_duplicate are read-only preparations, and submit_tool/get_submission/upgrade_listing cover separate lifecycle stages. start_login vs complete_login could seem similar but the descriptions make the ordering and purpose unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (start_login, complete_login, list_categories, check_duplicate, submit_tool, get_submission, upgrade_listing). The lone outlier is whoami, a conventional idiom but stylistically inconsistent with the rest.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for a directory submission flow, with each tool earning its place across auth, lookup, submission, and monetization steps. No redundant or filler tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full agent workflow: authenticate, discover categories, avoid duplicates, submit, poll status, and choose link tier. Minor gaps exist (no way to edit or withdraw a pending submission), but the core lifecycle is fully served without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources