Skip to main content
Glama

execute_agent

Execute a Strands agent by providing an agent name and prompt, enabling integration with Amazon Q and MCP-compatible systems for task automation and workflow enhancement.

Instructions

Execute an agent with a given prompt

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
agent_nameYesThe name of the agent to execute
promptYesThe prompt to execute the agent with

Implementation Reference

  • The execute_agent tool handler function. It is registered via the @mcp.tool decorator, with input schema defined using Annotated and Field for agent_name and prompt parameters. The function retrieves the agent from the registry, executes it with the prompt, and returns the result message as a string.
    @mcp.tool(description="Execute an agent with a given prompt")
    def execute_agent(agent_name: Annotated[str, Field(description="The name of the agent to execute")],
                      prompt: Annotated[str, Field(description="The prompt to execute the agent with")]) -> str:
        """
        Execute an agent with the provided name and prompt, return its response
        """
        agent = agent_registry.get(agent_name)
        result = agent.agent(prompt)
        return str(result.message)
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the action ('execute') but doesn't explain what execution involves (e.g., whether it runs a process, returns output, has side effects, requires permissions, or has rate limits). This leaves critical behavioral traits unspecified for a tool that likely performs a significant operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero wasted words. It's front-loaded with the core action and parameters, making it easy to parse quickly. Every word earns its place, adhering to best practices for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of executing an agent (likely a non-trivial operation), no annotations, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It fails to explain what happens during execution, what the output might be, or any behavioral context, leaving significant gaps for an AI agent to understand and use the tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, clearly documenting both parameters ('agent_name' and 'prompt'). The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, such as format examples or constraints. With high schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate as the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Execute an agent with a given prompt' clearly states the verb ('execute') and resource ('agent'), but it's vague about what execution entails (e.g., running a task, generating a response). It doesn't differentiate from sibling tools like 'list_agents' or 'list_skills', which are read-only listing operations, but the distinction is implied rather than explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites (e.g., needing an existing agent), exclusions, or how it relates to siblings like 'list_agents' for selecting an agent to execute. Usage is implied from the name and parameters but not explicitly stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/imgaray/strands-agents-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server