Apple Mail MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Apple Mail MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Apple Mail that reads from Mail's SQLite store for fast queries and writes through Mail.app via AppleScript, enabling mailbox management, search, drafts, and message updates without sending mail.5,452 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for Apple Mail on macOS that enables searching and reading emails directly from the local SQLite database, with fast SQL-level filtering and pagination.2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceLocal MCP server for macOS native apps: Mail, Calendar, Reminders, Notes, Messages, and Contacts. Enables reading and organizing your Mac life through a single stdio process using AppleScript/JXA.408 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that drives macOS Mail: read, search, send, organise.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that lets Claude read macOS Mail.app via JXA, with tools for listing accounts/mailboxes, searching and reading messages. Read-only by default, with optional opt-in write tools for compose drafts and Apple Calendar events.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that gives Claude and other MCP hosts full access to Mail.app on macOS — search, read, send, reply, flag, move, and more across all accounts configured in Mail.app.2453 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Multiple tools have overlapping purposes that could cause confusion. get_emails, get_flagged_emails, get_todays_emails, and get_unread_emails all retrieve emails with different filters, but their boundaries are unclear—an agent might struggle to choose between them when multiple criteria apply. The descriptions help somewhat, but the functional overlap is significant.
Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern throughout (e.g., get_emails, list_accounts, search_emails). All tools use snake_case with clear, descriptive names that align with their functions, making the set predictable and easy to understand.
With 7 tools, the count is well-scoped for an email management server. Each tool serves a distinct, useful purpose in the domain (e.g., retrieving emails, listing accounts/mailboxes, searching), and none feel redundant or missing in terms of quantity for the apparent scope.
There are significant gaps in the tool surface for email management. The server lacks essential CRUD operations like creating, sending, updating (e.g., marking as read/unread), or deleting emails, which are core to the domain. This will likely cause agent failures when trying to perform common email tasks beyond retrieval and listing.