paypal_get_subscription
Retrieve details of a PayPal subscription by its subscription ID.
Instructions
Get a subscription by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| subscription_id | Yes | The subscription id, e.g. I-XXXXXXXXXXXX |
Retrieve details of a PayPal subscription by its subscription ID.
Get a subscription by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| subscription_id | Yes | The subscription id, e.g. I-XXXXXXXXXXXX |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden of behavioral disclosure. The description only states the action but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as return format, authentication needs, or potential side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, highly concise and front-loaded. While it is extremely brief, it effectively communicates the core purpose with no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has no output schema and no annotations. With only one parameter, the description is minimal and does not explain what the tool returns or any other contextual information. For a simple get operation, it partially meets needs but lacks completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter, which already documents subscription_id as 'The subscription id, e.g. I-XXXXXXXXXXXX'. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema provides, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get a subscription by id' clearly states the verb (Get) and resource (subscription) with the method (by id). It distinguishes from siblings like paypal_get_capture or paypal_get_order by specifying the subscription resource.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No exclusions, prerequisites, or context for usage are mentioned. The description is purely declarative.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/imazhar101/paypal-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server