trello_archive_card
Archive a Trello card by providing its ID. The card is closed and moved to the archive, removing it from the board.
Instructions
Archivia (chiude) una card
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cardId | Yes | ID della card |
Archive a Trello card by providing its ID. The card is closed and moved to the archive, removing it from the board.
Archivia (chiude) una card
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cardId | Yes | ID della card |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only states the action without disclosing effects like reversibility, permissions, or side effects. Minimal behavioral context beyond the obvious.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, very concise, and front-loaded with the verb. However, it could include more context without being verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is too sparse for a tool with potential side effects. Lacks details on behavior, prerequisites, or consequences of archiving.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a single parameter described as 'ID della card'. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'Archivia' (archives) and resource 'card', distinguishing it from sibling tools like trello_create_card or trello_move_card. However, it does not elaborate on nuances versus similar actions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., trello_move_card or trello_update_card). No when-to-use or when-not-to-use context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/imanagerpms/trelloAI'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server