Skip to main content
Glama
imam-db

reimburse-buddy

by imam-db
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to reimburse-buddy

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Expense Claim Helper

      GuoHaoyu1688
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to review local travel expenses against fictional policy rules, preview and build immutable XLSX/PDF/DOCX/ZIP claim packages, and track submission, approval, and reimbursement status. Runs entirely offline with SQLite storage, receipt imports, exports, and portable backups.
      6
      MIT

    • policy-mcp

      EHRC
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching fictional policy documents and assessing expense claims against deterministic rules via MCP, returning structured assessments and citations without an approval tool.
      2
      MIT

    • p2p-finance

      sergio4848
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language-driven purchase-to-pay workflows against mock procurement and payment APIs, including invoice matching, exception handling, human approvals, and idempotent payment scheduling with a tamper-evident audit log.
      MIT

    • GenPark Ctrip Hotel Corporate

      alphaparkinc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to validate enterprise travel policies, audit hotel rate parity, and check carbon ESG compliance through a zero-dependency MCP server. It exposes policy and expense-auditing tools over STDIO JSON-RPC for use in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or other MCP runtimes.
      7
      MIT

    • REB

      samimeseik
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to reverse-engineer how an organization actually operates by ingesting documents, spreadsheets, chat exports, invoices and audio, then tracing every claim back to graded evidence. It supports process mining, stated-vs-enacted comparison, coverage and obligation tracking, and bilingual report generation while keeping unproven areas explicitly flagged as unknown.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: listing/reading claims, reading policy/mail/calendar/memos, running rules, triaging, drafting, and mutating status. The only mild overlap is check_claim vs triage_claims vs draft_decision (single claim, batch, and note drafting that re-runs rules), but the descriptions clearly delineate when to use each.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are snake_case verb_noun compounds, giving a predictable pattern. Verb choice varies a bit (get_/list_/search_/find_/check_), but each verb carries a real distinction rather than being random.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools sits comfortably in the well-scoped range, and every tool maps to a step in the reimbursement review workflow (evidence gathering, rule checking, approval, decision, demo reset). No tool feels redundant or filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the review lifecycle end to end: policy, evidence (inbox, calendar, memos, outbox), rule checking, triage, drafting, approvals, status updates, and reset. The main gap is claim intake/editing — there is no create_claim or item-update tool, so the agent can only review pre-existing claims.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources