Skip to main content
Glama

English | 한국어

MCP QA Lab

CI Python 3.11+ License: MIT

Evidence-driven quality testing for Model Context Protocol servers. MCP QA Lab connects as a real client, captures the complete model-facing contract, finds agent-usability risks, measures context cost, and runs only explicitly approved target calls.

Why use it?

A server can have perfect handler-level tests and still be difficult for an agent to use. Tool names may be ambiguous, input fields may be undocumented, pagination may be incomplete, and safety intent may be missing. MCP QA Lab tests that public protocol surface separately from implementation code.

flowchart LR
    A[Register target] --> B[Live protocol inspection]
    B --> C[Static contract checks]
    B --> D[Context-cost measurement]
    C --> E[Scenario generation]
    E --> F[Approved calls only]
    D --> G[Evidence report]
    F --> G

Related MCP server: MCProbe

Highlights

  • Complete paginated discovery of tools, prompts, resources, and resource templates

  • Deterministic checks for schema quality, naming, descriptions, and safety annotations

  • Model-facing contract size and approximate context-cost measurement

  • Host-model sampling for task-oriented scenario proposals

  • Explicit approval boundary for target tool calls with possible side effects

  • Secret-free target registration using environment variable names, never values

  • Redacted Markdown reports with reproducible evidence

  • Stdio and Streamable HTTP target support

Install

Install directly from the public repository:

uv tool install "git+https://github.com/efficjump/mcp-qa-lab.git"
mcp-qa-lab --transport stdio

For source development:

git clone https://github.com/efficjump/mcp-qa-lab.git
cd mcp-qa-lab
uv sync --all-extras --locked
uv run mcp-qa-lab --transport stdio

Generic MCP client configuration

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-qa-lab": {
      "command": "mcp-qa-lab",
      "args": ["--transport", "stdio"]
    }
  }
}

Client configuration formats vary; the command and arguments above do not require a local repository path after tool installation.

Tool workflow

Tool

Purpose

register_target

Persist a secret-free stdio or Streamable HTTP target definition

list_targets

List registered targets

inspect_target

Capture the live, paginated MCP contract

run_static_checks

Find deterministic contract and usability issues

measure_context_cost

Measure serialized contract size and approximate token cost

generate_scenarios

Ask the host model for evidence-oriented test journeys

run_target_tool

Invoke one reviewed target tool with safety approval

build_report

Write a redacted Markdown QA report

Safety defaults

  • Remote targets are denied unless MCP_QA_ALLOW_REMOTE=1.

  • Local target working directories must stay inside MCP_QA_ALLOWED_ROOTS when configured.

  • Registrations reference inherited environment variable names; values are never persisted.

  • Inspection and static checks never invoke target tools.

  • Tools without readOnlyHint: true require explicit side-effect approval.

  • Reports redact credentials, authorization headers, tokens, and URL user information.

The process boundary is not an operating-system sandbox. Run untrusted targets in an isolated environment.

Streamable HTTP

mcp-qa-lab --transport streamable-http --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8765

The default endpoint is http://127.0.0.1:8765/mcp. Keep the listener on loopback unless a separate authentication and network boundary is in place.

Development

uv sync --all-extras --locked
uv run ruff format --check .
uv run ruff check .
uv run mypy src
uv run pytest --cov --cov-report=term-missing
uv build

The coverage gate is 85%. See architecture, security policy, and contribution guide.

License

MIT

Available Tools

8 tools
build_reportA

Create a redacted Markdown report from a new live inspection and deterministic checks.

Inputs: target_id (required). Returns: object

generate_scenariosA
Read-only

Generate task-oriented multi-tool journeys using sampling, with an explicit fallback.

Inputs: objective (required), target_id (required), maximum_scenarios. Returns: object

inspect_targetA
Read-only

Connect to a target and capture its complete paginated model-facing MCP contract.

Inputs: target_id (required). Returns: object

list_targetsA
Read-only

List registered targets without resolving or exposing environment values.

Inputs: no named parameters. Returns: result

measure_context_costA
Read-only

Measure serialized model-facing tool metadata and exact duplicate descriptions.

Inputs: target_id (required). Returns: object

register_targetA

Register a secret-free stdio or Streamable HTTP target after boundary validation.

Inputs: name (required), transport (required), cwd, url, +4 more. Returns: object

run_static_checksA
Read-only

Analyze live schemas, descriptions, annotations, and size without tool calls.

Inputs: target_id (required). Returns: object

run_target_toolA
Destructive

Execute one call; non-read-only tools require explicit side-effect approval.

Inputs: arguments (required), target_id (required), tool_name (required), allow_side_effects. Returns: object

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (listing, registering, inspecting, checking, measuring, generating, executing, reporting). The only potential confusion is between run_static_checks and measure_context_cost, but their descriptions clarify that one focuses on quality/size analysis and the other on serialized metadata cost and duplicate descriptions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_targets, register_target, inspect_target, run_static_checks, measure_context_cost, generate_scenarios, run_target_tool, build_report). The naming is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is an appropriate scope for a QA lab. The set covers the main workflow areas without being bloated or sparse, aligning well with the typical 3-15 tool sweet spot.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the core workflow: register, inspect, run checks, measure cost, generate scenarios, execute a tool, and build a report. A minor gap is the absence of a delete/unregister target operation, which could make target lifecycle management incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets coding agents test AI agents. Create YAML test cases, snapshot golden baselines, check for regressions, and generate visual reports all from inside Claude Code or any MCP-compatible tool. Works with LangGraph, CrewAI, OpenAI, Claude, Mistral, and any HTTP API.
      10
      143 npm
      2,124 PyPI
      142
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A stdio MCP server that audits other MCP servers over the live protocol. It connects to any MCP target (stdio or HTTP), lints every tool's schema for agent-usability, then actually calls the tools with deliberately broken inputs to see how the server handles them, and returns a 0–100 conformance score with a per-dimension breakdown rendered as Markdown.
      6
      14 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A universal AI-powered testing server built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Allows AI agents to inspect, execute, test, monitor, debug, and report on software projects.
      3
      GNU Lesser General Public v2.1 only