ozon_get_products

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint and openWorldHint. Description adds pagination behavior (cursor-based via last_id) and return structure (JSON with ok, data, items, last_id). No contradiction. Could mention rate limits or error cases but sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: one-line purpose, then succinct parameter descriptions, return format, and cross-page guidance. No redundant sentences.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers essential aspects: purpose, parameters, return format, and pagination. Output schema exists and description complements it. No mention of error handling or rate limits, but acceptable for a read-only list tool. Could add default visibility hint.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description carries full burden. It explains all three parameters: visibility with examples, limit with max constraint, and last_id as cursor. Adds meaning beyond schema types and defaults.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'List Ozon products (one page)'. The verb 'List' and resource 'Ozon products' are specific, and it distinguishes from siblings by mentioning pagination and cross-page usage.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states this tool returns one page, and for multiple pages it recommends using ozon_fetch_all with ozon_product_list. This provides clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.