sailfishos-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to sailfishos-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that assists with the orchestration of new software projects by applying standardized templates and best practices in design patterns and software architecture.17MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that scaffolds full-stack projects with consistent structure, Docker setup, CI/CD pipelines, and database configuration.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations development, enabling object creation, modification, deletion, and analysis through the MCP standard.MIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables deployment and management of MCP servers through a simple configuration-based interface.1-
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for project management automation, providing tools for project health, documentation, task management, security scanning, and CI/CD validation.271MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enforces development discipline and workflow best practices, guiding users through a structured process of coding, testing, documenting, committing, and releasing.35 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: metadata injection, feature addition, building, cleaning, project creation, deployment, guidelines retrieval, pitfalls listing, and snippet provision. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.
All tools follow a consistent 'sailfish_verb_noun' pattern, using snake_case throughout. This uniformity enhances readability and predictability, with no deviations in naming style across the set.
With 9 tools, the server is well-scoped for SailfishOS development, covering key lifecycle stages from project creation to deployment, along with supportive utilities like guidelines and snippets. Each tool earns its place without bloat.
The toolset provides strong coverage of core development workflows, including project setup, building, and deployment. Minor gaps exist, such as the lack of tools for testing or debugging, but agents can likely work around these with existing tools.