A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceEnables non-multimodal models to see images by providing MCP tools for image understanding and OCR, backed by any OpenAI-compatible vision model.
2
MIT
analyze-image-mcp
by iljyxa
Related Servers
Alternatives to analyze-image-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides an MCP tool that analyzes images from local paths, URLs, or data URLs via a vision language model, returning structured descriptions (brief, detailed, summary) so text-only LLMs can understand image content.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to gain vision capabilities by analyzing images, extracting text, and comparing images through any OpenAI-compatible vision endpoint.27 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceGives text-only LLMs vision capabilities via MCP, using vision models like Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5 to analyze images, describe content, and extract text through tools such as analyze_image, describe_image, and extract_text_from_image.31MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables text-only agents to process images by accepting image files, base64 data, or URLs, sending them to multimodal models, and returning structured text results via MCP.41-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceBridges a vision model to enable text-only models like DeepSeek to describe images, extract text, and compare images via MCP tools.534 npm9MIT
TDQS
A4.3/5.0
Scored across 1 tool
Disambiguation5/5
There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another. Its purpose—analyze an image and return a text description—is unambiguous, and the description clearly scopes when to use it.
Naming Consistency5/5
The single tool name 'analyze_image' follows a clean verb_noun snake_case convention. With no other names to conflict with, consistency is trivially perfect.
Tool Count4/5
The server's scope is narrowly a single capability—image analysis—so one tool is largely justified and each tool earns its place. It sits below the typical 3-15 range, and optional additions like batch analysis or multi-image comparison could be argued for, keeping it just short of ideal.
Completeness4/5
The tool covers the core lifecycle for its purpose: it accepts local paths, file URIs, http(s) URLs, and data URLs, so most image-referencing workflows are reachable. Minor gaps exist around batch/multiple-image handling and structured output options, but no dead ends for the primary use case.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues