confluence_createSpaceTemplateFromFile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that the tool fails if a template with the same name exists, which is a useful behavioral trait. However, it does not mention authorization requirements, rate limits, or the fact it uses an experimental API endpoint. No annotations are provided to supplement these gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: first defines the core action, second provides usage context and a failure condition. Front-loaded and efficient with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks information about the success response format (e.g., return of template ID). For a creation tool with no output schema, the description should at least indicate what the agent can expect on success. The failure case is covered, but success context is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with each parameter described. The description adds limited value beyond the schema, such as an example for 'name' and the source for 'filePath'. Baseline is 3 since schema already documents all parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action (create a new space page template from a local XML file) and the API endpoint. The phrase 'BSA заготовка' introduces jargon that may reduce clarity for general agents, but the overall purpose is distinct from sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides a specific use case ('Use after a new BSA заготовка exists...') but does not explicitly state when to avoid this tool or mention alternatives. Sibling tools like update/delete/list are present but not referenced.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.