Skip to main content
Glama

Manage Cookies

manage_cookies

Inspect, clear, save, or load browser cookies to manage session state, preserve logins between runs, or reset website state during testing.

Instructions

Manage cookies for the current browser session.

Use this tool to inspect, clear, save, or restore browser cookies. Cookie management is useful for inspecting session state, preserving login sessions between browser runs, restoring previously saved sessions, or resetting website state during testing.

Args: action: - "get_all": Return all cookies currently available to the browser, including attributes such as name, value, domain, path, expiry, and security flags. - "clear": Delete all cookies from the current browser session. - "save": Save current cookies to filename. The file may be created or overwritten. - "load": Load cookies from filename into the current browser session.

filename: Filesystem path used by save/load.
    Ignored for get_all and clear.

Returns: "get_all": Current browser cookies. "clear": Confirmation that cookies were cleared. "save": Confirmation containing the destination filename. "load": Confirmation containing the source filename.

Security: Cookie data can contain authentication credentials, session identifiers, and other private information. Only inspect, save, load, or share cookies when explicitly authorized.

`filename` is passed to SeleniumBase's cookie persistence methods and
can access the filesystem available to the MCP server. Use only
trusted, authorized paths. The save action may overwrite an existing
file.

Notes: Loading saved cookies does not guarantee restoration of a login. Cookies may be expired, invalidated, domain/path restricted, or dependent on other browser state. Navigate to the relevant site when necessary so the browser has the appropriate origin for the cookies.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
actionNoget_all
filenameNocookies.txt

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It warns about authentication credentials and private data, notes that save may overwrite files, explains that filename can access the MCP server's filesystem, and honestly caveats that loaded cookies may not restore a login. This is unusually transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with headings for Args, Returns, Security, and Notes, with the core purpose front-loaded. The length is justified because each section adds essential behavior not otherwise conveyed, given the minimal schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Complete for a 2-parameter tool with no annotations and no output schema. It covers per-action return values, filesystem risks, overwrite behavior, and the practical limitations of loading cookies. An agent has everything needed to invoke the tool correctly and safely.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 0% schema description coverage, the description fully compensates by explaining every action value and its effect, and by specifying that filename is only used by save/load and ignored for get_all/clear. The parameter meaning is unambiguous.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a concrete resource and action set: 'Manage cookies for the current browser session' and enumerates four specific operations (inspect, clear, save, restore). The cookie focus clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like manage_history and manage_storage.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit use cases: inspecting session state, preserving login sessions, restoring saved sessions, and resetting website state. It does not explicitly contrast with alternatives or state when not to use the tool, so it falls just short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.