Skip to main content
Glama
ikhide
by ikhide

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Screen Text

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to capture and analyze screenshots of your screen, windows, or regions with smart detection capabilities. Features natural language queries, automatic window targeting, and text enhancement for UI debugging and visual inspection.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A cross-platform MCP server that allows AI agents to capture screenshots of specific windows, displays, or regions for native application testing. It provides tools to list active windows and monitors, enabling precise visual verification and interaction during automated workflows.
      20 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to capture and analyze screen content across multi-monitor setups with smart image optimization. Provides screenshot capabilities and detailed monitor information for visual debugging, UI analysis, and desktop assistance.
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local Windows UI automation and screen capture, targeting windows that are difficult to automate such as games and legacy apps, with tools for window management, mouse and keyboard input, and desktop capture.
      8
      -

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools have overlapping purposes that could cause confusion. For example, capture_application_screen and capture_screen_and_extract_text both handle application window screenshots, while capture_screen and capture_screen_and_extract_text both handle full-screen captures. The descriptions help somewhat, but the boundaries between tools are unclear, especially for agents trying to choose between similar options.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structures (e.g., capture_screen, extract_text, list_applications). There are no deviations in naming style, making the set predictable and easy to parse programmatically.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 5 tools, the count is well-scoped for a screen text capture domain, though it feels slightly thin. Each tool appears to serve a purpose, but the overlap suggests some tools could be consolidated, making the count borderline but still reasonable for the server's functionality.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers core operations like capturing screens, extracting text, and listing applications, but there are notable gaps. For instance, there's no way to manage or delete captured images, and the OCR functionality is split across tools without clear update or configuration options, which could lead to agent workarounds for full lifecycle handling.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues