Skip to main content
Glama
iinniitt

DeFi Guard MCP

by iinniitt
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to DeFi Guard MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • basescope

      chasdaddy
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      basescope is a read-only onchain safety layer for AI agents: it answers "is this token/contract/approval safe?" on Base and EVM chains (honeypot/rug checks, risky-approval detection, verified-source lookup, balances, ENS/Basenames, gas, prices), with no private keys and no required API keys.
      13
      7 npm
      1
      MIT

    • SENTINEL

      teodorofodocrispin-cmyk
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Agent-Level Transaction Safety Oracle. Before an AI agent signs a blockchain transaction, it returns a SAFE/UNSAFE verdict with a SENTINEL Score (AAA-D) and risk flags. Pay-per-call $0.005 USDC via x402 on Base.
      1
      -

    • Guardian MCP

      izmiradami
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Security layer for AI agents that evaluates transaction intents and returns verdicts (ALLOW/WARN/DENY) using deterministic rules, on-chain checks, and simulation.
      4 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool addresses a distinct aspect of DeFi safety: position health, swap quoting, token liquidity, token safety, contract capabilities, and approval risk. There is no meaningful overlap; even the two token-focused tools (token_risk_snapshot and token_safety_screen) target different concerns (market depth vs. trade-ability/ownership).

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names use lowercase with underscores and follow a compound noun or verb-noun structure. Most start with a noun (aave_position_health, token_risk_snapshot, approval_risk), while two start with verbs (quote_swap, scan_dangerous_capabilities), which is a minor inconsistency but not confusing.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the server is tightly scoped to its DeFi guard purpose. Each tool covers a core risk area and none feel redundant or excessive. This is an ideal size for the stated domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers major DeFi risk vectors: position health, swap pricing, token liquidity, honeypot/tax checks, dangerous contract capabilities, and approval exposure. A minor gap is the lack of a comprehensive transaction simulation or portfolio-level risk assessment, but the core safety workflows are well supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources