Skip to main content
Glama
iijimam

RAGandLLM-MCP

by iijimam

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
upload_fileC

魚の画像を渡すと魚名が返ります。補足情報として魚IDも返ります。

get_recipeC

ユーザプロンプトと前回取得した魚名、魚IDを元にレシピ生成

register_chokaC

釣果登録が行えます

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

C2.9/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_recipe generates recipes, register_choka registers fishing catches, and upload_file identifies fish from images. There is no overlap in functionality, and an agent can easily tell them apart based on their unique operations.

Naming Consistency4/5

The tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_recipe, register_choka, upload_file), with all using snake_case. The minor deviation is that 'choka' is a domain-specific term (Japanese for fishing catch), but the naming structure remains predictable and readable throughout.

Tool Count3/5

With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for its apparent scope in RAG and LLM applications related to fishing and recipes. While each tool is distinct, the set lacks depth for comprehensive workflows, such as managing recipes or handling multiple fishing data operations, making it borderline for the domain.

Completeness2/5

There are significant gaps in the tool surface for a RAG/LLM server focused on fishing and recipes. Missing operations include updating or deleting recipes, querying fishing data, managing user profiles, or integrating with LLM models beyond basic generation. This incompleteness will likely cause agent failures in extended tasks.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues