Scored across 25 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action, and descriptions explicitly say when to use and when to avoid each (e.g. task_status vs task_audit, task_park vs task_finalize). The main overlap is load_context vs resume, which produce identical output and differ only in usage context, and bundle_inspect vs bundle_import_plan, which are close but distinguishable.
Most tools follow a clean verb_noun/noun_verb pattern (record_dead_end, attach_evidence, task_start, bundle_import, task_finalize). A few deviate: noun-only names like source_status and release_preflight, plus single-word tools (checkpoint, resume, diff, replay), but overall the set is predictable and readable.
At 25 tools this sits at the heavy end and is borderline for the apparent scope. The domain (task lifecycle, ledger, bundles, context, releases) is broad enough to justify many of them, but the redundant load_context/resume pair and the three-way bundle inspect/plan/import suggest some could be consolidated.
The surface covers the full task lifecycle (start/park/switch/update/verify/finalize/audit/handoff), bundle round-trips (export/import/inspect/plan), ledger recording (decision/dead_end/evidence/source), and context tooling (load_context/resume/checkpoint/diff/replay). Minor gaps exist, such as no way to list or retrieve previously attached evidence, but core workflows are covered.
