Skip to main content
Glama
ihor-sokoliuk

SearXNG Server

by ihor-sokoliuk
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to SearXNG Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-searxng

      atomlong
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that integrates the SearXNG API for web search and URL content extraction with advanced features like pagination, caching, and proxy support.
      4
      12,610 npm
      2
      MIT

    • SearXNG MCP Server

      tobioffice
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that integrates with the SearXNG API to provide comprehensive web search capabilities with features like time filtering, language selection, and safe search. It also enables users to fetch and convert web content from specific URLs into markdown format.
      2
      16 npm
      4
      MIT

    • mcp-searxng-local

      dduartee
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for local web search via SearXNG, providing unlimited queries without API keys or cost, with automatic fallback to public instances.
      3
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes: searxng_web_search performs web searches, while web_url_read fetches and extracts content from URLs. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools use snake_case and are descriptive, but the naming pattern differs: searxng_web_search includes the service prefix, while web_url_read does not. The verb-noun order is also inconsistent (verb-noun vs noun-verb). Overall, still clear and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the set feels minimal but adequate for a basic web search and content retrieval use case. It does not overcomplicate, though it may leave room for additional utility tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover the core workflow: search the web and read full content of results. Minor gaps include advanced search filters (e.g., site, filetype) or management features, but the essential functionality is present.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources