Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to elba-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude and Cursor to manage customers, create and update draft invoices, list or download invoices as PDF and XML e-invoices, and record and list payments in a BillingEngine account. It runs locally with your API key and never deletes data.
      10
      67 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude and other MCP clients to manage a small-business back office, including clients, quotes, invoices, payments, reports, and PDF invoice export, while keeping data in a local SQLite file.
      21
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Elorus invoicing and accounting platform, enabling AI assistants to create invoices, manage contacts, and query financial data through natural language.
      43
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Look up Russian companies by INN (tax ID) from Claude Desktop, Cursor or any MCP client: full company card, multi-year financials from official tax filings, bankruptcy and state-inspection history, trademarks and sanctions lists. Works without an API key — the anonymous free tier is enabled by default.
      5
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Hosted MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage clients, invoices, and expenses via the Invox API, supporting actions like drafting, sending, cancelling, and marking invoices as paid, as well as logging expenses and updating client information.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: creation flows are split between from-scratch (elba_create_act/elba_create_upd) and from-bill variants, and contractor find/get/create are distinguishable. The only mild fuzziness is in the reporting cluster (elba_unpaid, elba_report, elba_payment_news, elba_get_bill), which all surface bill/payment status, though descriptions do differentiate list vs aggregate vs news feed vs single bill.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a consistent elba_ prefix and snake_case, which makes the set easy to scan. Most are verb_noun (create_bill, act_from_bill, find_contractor), but several are bare nouns (organizations, templates, unpaid, report, payment_news), a minor deviation from the pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 19 tools the set is slightly on the heavy side, but the domain (bills, acts, UPDs, contractors, links, orgs, templates, reporting, INN lookup) legitimately needs this breadth. Each tool maps to a real operation, with no obvious filler.

    Completeness3/5

    Creation and read paths are well covered, but mutation is thin: no update/delete for contractors, no update/cancel/delete for bills, and acts/UPDs can be created but not fetched or listed by id. The elba_link_publish description references cancelled bills, yet no cancellation tool exists, which is a notable lifecycle gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues